2016
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A juvenile subfossil crocodylian from Anjohibe Cave, Northwestern Madagascar

Abstract: Madagascar’s subfossil record preserves a diverse community of animals including elephant birds, pygmy hippopotamus, giant lemurs, turtles, crocodiles, bats, rodents, and carnivorans. These fossil accumulations give us a window into the island’s past from 80,000 years ago to a mere few hundred years ago, recording the extinction of some groups and the persistence of others. The crocodylian subfossil record is limited to two taxa, Voay robustus and Crocodylus niloticus, found at sites distributed throughout the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A single date for Voay from the coastal site of Ankilibehandry in western Madagascar proves that this species, like Madagascar's other megafauna, survived into the late Holocene (1920 ± 30 14 C a bp , or 1813 ± 78 cal a bp , CAMS 167399; previously unpublished). A single radiocarbon date for subfossil Crocodylus niloticus from Anjohibe in the north‐west is more recent (360 ± 25 14 C a bp , or 385 ± 75 cal a bp , CAMS 150524; Crowley & Samonds, ; Mathews & Samonds, ). These two dates are consistent with the recent arrival of C. niloticus to Madagascar but fail to resolve the question of possible prolonged temporal overlap between V. robustus and C. niloticus , or specifically whether Crocodylus may have outcompeted Voay , or if Voay disappeared before Crocodylus arrived (Brochu, ; Burney et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single date for Voay from the coastal site of Ankilibehandry in western Madagascar proves that this species, like Madagascar's other megafauna, survived into the late Holocene (1920 ± 30 14 C a bp , or 1813 ± 78 cal a bp , CAMS 167399; previously unpublished). A single radiocarbon date for subfossil Crocodylus niloticus from Anjohibe in the north‐west is more recent (360 ± 25 14 C a bp , or 385 ± 75 cal a bp , CAMS 150524; Crowley & Samonds, ; Mathews & Samonds, ). These two dates are consistent with the recent arrival of C. niloticus to Madagascar but fail to resolve the question of possible prolonged temporal overlap between V. robustus and C. niloticus , or specifically whether Crocodylus may have outcompeted Voay , or if Voay disappeared before Crocodylus arrived (Brochu, ; Burney et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total body length estimated for these groups of phytosaur individuals is as follows: Skeletally immature or juvenile individuals, characterized by unfused cranial and neurocentral sutures, large orbits relative to the skull, poorly developed muscle scars, and cranial and mandibular ornamentation (Buffrénil 1982; Brochu 1996; Fara & Hungerbühler 2000; Holliday & Nesbitt 2013; Witzmann et al . 2014; Mathews & Samonds 2016; Griffin et al 2021) had a total body length of <5 m. Skeletally mature or adult individuals that had well‐developed muscle scars, and ornamentation on the skull and mandible, and fused cranial and neurocentral sutures (Fara & Hungerbühler 2000; Holliday & Nesbitt 2013; Witzmann et al . 2014; Mathews & Samonds 2016; Griffin et al .…”
Section: Osteological Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2014; Mathews & Samonds 2016; Griffin et al 2021) had a total body length of <5 m. Skeletally mature or adult individuals that had well‐developed muscle scars, and ornamentation on the skull and mandible, and fused cranial and neurocentral sutures (Fara & Hungerbühler 2000; Holliday & Nesbitt 2013; Witzmann et al . 2014; Mathews & Samonds 2016; Griffin et al . 2021) attained full body size >7 m. Transitional or sub‐adult individuals had a total body length of 5–7 m. These were characterized by features intermediate to the skeletally immature and mature individuals, such as partially fused sutures between bones, moderately developed muscle scars, and cranial and mandibular ornamentations.…”
Section: Osteological Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%