International Environmental Law and the Global South 2015
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781107295414.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Justice Paradox: Climate Change, Small Island Developing States, and the Absence of International Legal Remedy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was also an expansion of the human rights lens, which sought to unpack climate migrants’ rights (e.g., see Wewerinke‐Singh, 2018). There was, however, an acknowledged absence of appropriate legal remedies (Burkett, 2015) and policies, especially related to loss and damage (Thomas & Benjamin, 2018), and of valid ways to secure legal status for those forced from their homes (Fornalé et al, 2016). Here, the need for the creation and effective functioning of national and/or international mechanisms for delivering climate justice for SIDS is clear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was also an expansion of the human rights lens, which sought to unpack climate migrants’ rights (e.g., see Wewerinke‐Singh, 2018). There was, however, an acknowledged absence of appropriate legal remedies (Burkett, 2015) and policies, especially related to loss and damage (Thomas & Benjamin, 2018), and of valid ways to secure legal status for those forced from their homes (Fornalé et al, 2016). Here, the need for the creation and effective functioning of national and/or international mechanisms for delivering climate justice for SIDS is clear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political manipulation, in this regard, lends itself to the promulgation of misaligned national development strategies, which has implications for resilience and transformation in SIDS (see related discussions in Holler, Bernier, Roberts, & Robinson, 2020). Following AR5's publication, studies that focused on climate-related displacement, relocation, resettlement, and forced migration began adopting a clearer climate justice orientation (e.g., see Asugeni, MacLaren, Massey, & Speare, 2015;Burkett, 2015;Fornalé, Guélat, & Piguet, 2016;Wewerinke-Singh, 2018;Zellentin, 2015). Some attention was paid to the interaction of multiple climate stressors and vulnerabilities that result in displacement (e.g., see Martin et al, 2018;McCubbin et al, 2015) but far more to the "fairness" of interventions and outcomes, sometimes against the backdrop of countries' colonial histories and negligible greenhouse gas emissions, alongside the mental health burdens of losing one's home, income, traditions, and culture (e.g., see Asugeni et al, 2015;Baptiste & Rhiney, 2016;Zellentin, 2015).…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a provocative article titled "Human Rights and Root Causes," Susan Marks (2011) calls for an examination of the systemic causes of injustice and proposes that scholars and activists spend less time pursuing state-oriented reforms that demobilize oppositional activity and more time channeling grievances into organized and coherent action. Climate-vulnerable states and peoples are using every legal tool at their disposal to seek climate justice (Burkett 2015), and it is important to heed their voices, support their work, and critique emerging legal and policy responses to climate displacement that reinforce abyssal exclusion. However, it is also essential to identify the larger structural causes of environmental, economic, and racial injustice and the opportunities for emancipatory collective action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter suggests that the resources available to them will play a key role. Hence, the availability of a favourable stock of legal precedent (for example on human rights) in domestic or potentially international or foreign courts would create a positive legal opportunity structure that may encourage a community to adopt litigation as a strategy (Andersen, 2005;Burkett, 2013). Equally, access to resources and professional legal support structures are also likely to be important to such a decision (Epp, 1998).…”
Section: Understanding Claims-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%