A journey from Rio to Paris via Kyoto to facilitate technology transfer to the LDCs under the UNFCCC

Azam, M. Monirul

doi:10.1108/jppel-05-2020-0024

Cited by 5 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 20 publications

(24 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…10, PA). Institutions such as the Technology Mechanism [including the Technology Executive Committee (TEC) and the Climate Technology Centre & Network (CTCN)] or the Green Climate Fund (GCF) have been set up to contribute via financial, capacity and other types of international support (Azam, 2021). The Paris Agreement provides for international cooperation to "allow for higher ambition" (Art.…”

Section: Potential Governance Principles Regarding International Supp...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The ABC of Governance Principles for Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy

Honegger

Baatz²,

Eberenz³

et al. 2022

Front. Clim.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Climate change mitigation actions, including those aimed at developing and scaling carbon dioxide removal (CDR) activities spanning the industrial, energy, and agroforestry sector, emerge in a context of internationally shared norms that include governance objectives, legal provisions and informal expectations, and societal expectations. Established governance principles provide normative orientation for policy including when targeting the development and scaling of CDR. Knowledge of these principles can guide effective discussion and evaluation of policy options. To facilitate discussion of mitigation options among experts and CDR practitioners, this study excerpts governance principles from legislative texts, the climate governance literature, and the CDR literature with relevance to CDR policy considerations. To illustrate the relevance of the governance principles found for evaluating policy options, we apply them to three technology groups of CDR: Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage (DACCS), and forestry. This exercise indicates the importance of more intensive attention to the normative dimension of mitigation policies in ongoing deliberative and planning processes. Such efforts can help disentangle normative and factual dimensions and sources of (dis)agreement on the role of CDR in specific climate policy contexts.

show abstract

Section: Potential Governance Principles Regarding International Supp...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The ABC of Governance Principles for Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy

Honegger

Baatz²,

Eberenz³

et al. 2022

Front. Clim.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…El segundo, el de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU) en dos sentidos. El primero, en cuanto al establecimiento de la soberanía estatal sobre los recursos naturales (dentro de los cuales se encuentran los energéticos) a partir de la Resolución de la Asamblea General sobre la Soberanía sobre los Recursos Naturales; el segundo y más reciente el Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático (CMNUCC) cuyo acuerdo emblemático es el Acuerdo de París -y antes, el fallido Protocolo de Kioto (Azam, 2021), mediante el cual los Estados nacionales voluntariamente establecieron Objetivos Nacionalmente Determinados que vinculan los compromisos de reducción de emisiones contaminantes con la descarbonización de los sistemas energéticos (Minas, 2020;Minnerop, 2020;Rajamani y Werksman, 2018).…”

Section: Capital Naturaleza Y Energíaunclassified

“…Las respuestas desde el modelo de sistema energético dominante se han concentrado en el cambio tecnológico y solamente de forma secundaria han incluido elementos que consideren temas como la pobreza y la justicia energética. En este contexto podemos observar las dificultades a escala global para negociar mecanismos de financiamiento y de transferencia tecnológica que permitan avanzar hacia la socialización de proyectos que permitan mitigar el cambio climático (Minas, 2020;Kirchherr y Urban, 2018;Azam, 2021). También podemos observar que las medidas propuestas se basan en tecnologías, que además de no estar probadas en su utilización a gran escala, en realidad no tienen un horizonte para transformar el modelo de generación y las pautas de consumo energético, como es el caso del secuestro de carbono.…”

Section: Capital Naturaleza Y Energíaunclassified

The dispute over the energy transition in Mexico under dependent conditions

Sandoval Cervantes

2023

AECS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar los márgenes y horizontes de la transición energética en México. El trabajo se adscribe a los estudios críticos de la energía y la teoría de la dependencia. La metodología utilizada es el análisis crítico de las condiciones globales de la transición en un contexto de capitalismo fósil, para luego abordar cómo este contexto sociohistórico construye el bloqueo de carbono en la política energética mexicana y los horizontes de la disputa contemporánea por una transición energética justa y democrática en México. El ensayo consta de dos secciones: una primera dedicada a la crítica de

show abstract

“…Certain bilateral initiatives are also in operation. However, in overall terms, the focus of most of the interventions is on the diffusion of available technologies and less on technology development or building of innovation capacities of the developing country actors, limiting progress and effectiveness (Azam, 2021).…”

Section: Experiences With International Technology Transfer In Select...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries

Pandey

Coninck

Sagar

2021

WIREs Energy & Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While technology continues to be seen as a key element in the move to sustainable development, international efforts around technology to support sustainable development transitions in developing countries have failed to yield results congruent with the needs. This review paper aims to contribute to, and help change, the conversation on international technology transfer (ITT) such that it leads to more productive international cooperative efforts for sustainable development in developing nations. We examine ITT in the health, agriculture, and climate and energy areas, juxtaposing it with relevant literature. Supporting domestic and international actors and processes, we highlight what are key elements for success in these areas of action to more effectively implement the SDGs in energy and environment in developing countries. Finally, we suggest that “innovation cooperation” is a better framing than “technology transfer” for advancing international efforts on technology for sustainable development. Such a framing allows for a broader and more comprehensive perspective on technology‐related cooperation between countries. It also emphasizes the need for equitable partnerships rather than donor–recipient relationships and for development of local innovation capabilities, leading to more effective marshaling of technologies to help developing countries achieve sustainable development. This article is categorized under: Energy Policy and Planning > Economics and Policy Energy and Climate > Systems and Infrastructure Energy Research & Innovation > Climate and Environment

show abstract

A journey from Rio to Paris via Kyoto to facilitate technology transfer to the LDCs under the UNFCCC

Cited by 5 publications

References 20 publications

The ABC of Governance Principles for Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy

The ABC of Governance Principles for Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy

The dispute over the energy transition in Mexico under dependent conditions

Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About