“…The is just a small numerical constant to prevent extra considerations such as 00 0log0 00 . Furthermore, we are using homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions approximated by one side differences u l ðx i;1 Þ ¼ u l ðx i;2 Þ; u l ðx 1;j Þ ¼ u l ðx 2;j Þ; u l ðx i;NÀ1 Þ ¼ u l ðx i;N Þ; u l ðx NÀ1;j Þ ¼ u l ðx N;j Þ; l ¼ 1; 2: Minimizing equation (19) brings a system of nonlinear equation with unknown U:…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for dU and update U U þ sdU with s as the Armijo line search parameter. 26 H and G are the Hessian and gradient matrix for the functional J in equation (19) with respect to the displacement vector U. The algorithm for the proposed regmentation model based on MI is given in Algorithm 1 where the multilevel approach is adapted for fast computation of the model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is not designed for general image deformation as the model applies rigid image transformation. Recently, a joint segmentation and registration model has been proposed by Debroux and Le Guyader, 19 which is formulated based on the combination of nonlocal total variation and nonlocal shape descriptors. The fitting term of this model uses a weighted sum of squared difference distance measure, similar to 7 and the model depends on the many parameters such as window size, patch size, number of neighbors pixels, etc.…”
Image segmentation and registration are closely related image processing techniques and often required as simultaneous tasks. In this work, we introduce an optimization-based approach to a joint registration and segmentation model for multimodal images deformation. The model combines an active contour variational term with mutual information (MI) smoothing fitting term and solves in this way the difficulties of simultaneously performed segmentation and registration models for multimodal images. This combination takes into account the image structure boundaries and the movement of the objects, leading in this way to a robust dynamic scheme that links the object boundaries information that changes over time. Comparison of our model with state of art shows that our method leads to more consistent registrations and accurate results.
“…The is just a small numerical constant to prevent extra considerations such as 00 0log0 00 . Furthermore, we are using homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions approximated by one side differences u l ðx i;1 Þ ¼ u l ðx i;2 Þ; u l ðx 1;j Þ ¼ u l ðx 2;j Þ; u l ðx i;NÀ1 Þ ¼ u l ðx i;N Þ; u l ðx NÀ1;j Þ ¼ u l ðx N;j Þ; l ¼ 1; 2: Minimizing equation (19) brings a system of nonlinear equation with unknown U:…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for dU and update U U þ sdU with s as the Armijo line search parameter. 26 H and G are the Hessian and gradient matrix for the functional J in equation (19) with respect to the displacement vector U. The algorithm for the proposed regmentation model based on MI is given in Algorithm 1 where the multilevel approach is adapted for fast computation of the model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is not designed for general image deformation as the model applies rigid image transformation. Recently, a joint segmentation and registration model has been proposed by Debroux and Le Guyader, 19 which is formulated based on the combination of nonlocal total variation and nonlocal shape descriptors. The fitting term of this model uses a weighted sum of squared difference distance measure, similar to 7 and the model depends on the many parameters such as window size, patch size, number of neighbors pixels, etc.…”
Image segmentation and registration are closely related image processing techniques and often required as simultaneous tasks. In this work, we introduce an optimization-based approach to a joint registration and segmentation model for multimodal images deformation. The model combines an active contour variational term with mutual information (MI) smoothing fitting term and solves in this way the difficulties of simultaneously performed segmentation and registration models for multimodal images. This combination takes into account the image structure boundaries and the movement of the objects, leading in this way to a robust dynamic scheme that links the object boundaries information that changes over time. Comparison of our model with state of art shows that our method leads to more consistent registrations and accurate results.
“…In recent years, joint image processing models have experienced increasing attention, including combined segmentation/registration models [30,34] (joint phase field approximation and registration), [45] (model based on metric structure comparison), [26,61] (level set formulation that merges the piecewise constant Mumford-Shah model with registration principles), [33] (grounded in the expectation maximisation algorithm), [25] (based on a nonlocal characterisation of weighted-total variation and nonlocal shape descriptors), or [1,43,52,55,63,68]; joint image reconstruction and motion estimation [9,14,19,51,57,62,13,46,6]; joint reconstruction and registration for post-acquisition motion correction [22] with the goal to reconstruct a single motion-free corrected image and retrieve the physiological dynamics through the deformation maps, joint optical flow estimation with phase field segmentation of the flow field [12], or joint segmentation/optimal transport models [10] (to determine the velocity of blood flow in vascular structures). This can be attributed to several factors: (i) the will to limit error propagation.…”
In medical image analysis, constructing an atlas, i.e. a mean representative of an ensemble of images, is a critical task for practitioners to estimate variability of shapes inside a population, and to characterise and understand how structural shape changes have an impact on health. This involves identifying significant shape constituents of a set of images, a process called segmentation, and mapping this group of images to an unknown mean image, a task called registration, making a statistical analysis of the image population possible. To achieve this goal, we propose treating these operations jointly to leverage their positive mutual influence, in a hyperelasticity setting, by viewing the shapes to be matched as Ogden materials. The approach is complemented by novel hard constraints on the L ∞ norm of both the Jacobian and its inverse, ensuring that the deformation is a bi-Lipschitz homeomorphism. Segmentation is based on the Potts model, which allows for a partition into more than two regions, i.e. more than one shape. The connection to the registration problem is ensured by the dissimilarity measure that aims to align the segmented shapes. A representation of the deformation field in a linear space equipped with a scalar product is then computed in order to perform a geometry-driven Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and to extract the main modes of variations inside the image population. Theoretical results emphasizing the mathematical soundness of the model are provided, among which existence of minimisers, analysis of a numerical method of resolution, asymptotic results and a PCA analysis, as well as numerical simulations demonstrating the ability of the modeling to produce an atlas exhibiting sharp edges, high contrast and a consistent shape.
“…Sharing representation between tasks and carefully intertwining them allows to reduce error propagation, to create synergies, to compensate for some possible flaws such as image quality impairment, while increasing the accuracy of the outcomes and bridging the gap towards generalization. Joint segmentation and registration models such as [16], [18] (joint phase field approximation and registration), [21] (model based on metric structure comparison), [15], [25] (level set formulation that merges the piecewise constant Mumford-Shah model with registration principles), [17] (grounded in the expectation maximization algorithm), [14] (based on a nonlocal characterization of weighted-total variation and nonlocal shape descriptors), or [1], [20], [23], [24], [27], fall within this framework.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.