2011
DOI: 10.1002/sim.4239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A joint modeling approach to data with informative cluster size: Robustness to the cluster size model

Abstract: In many biomedical and epidemiological studies, data are often clustered due to longitudinal follow up or repeated sampling. While in some clustered data the cluster size is pre-determined, in others it may be correlated to the outcome of subunits, resulting in informative cluster size. When the cluster size is informative, standard statistical procedures that ignore cluster size may produce biased estimates. One attractive framework for modeling data with informative cluster size is the joint modeling approac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The N K S B P N I , N K S B P I − N , and c N K S B P I models provided ER curves that agreed less with the truth, though the fit was similar at the lower doses. We note that using an incorrect distribution assumption for the cluster size model may induce biases (Chen et al ), which is supported by the results that the N K S B P I − N model induced a considerable bias in the ER curves.…”
Section: Simulation Studiessupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The N K S B P N I , N K S B P I − N , and c N K S B P I models provided ER curves that agreed less with the truth, though the fit was similar at the lower doses. We note that using an incorrect distribution assumption for the cluster size model may induce biases (Chen et al ), which is supported by the results that the N K S B P I − N model induced a considerable bias in the ER curves.…”
Section: Simulation Studiessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In addition, the distribution of the cluster‐specific random effect b i is assigned a nonparametric DP prior with precision α b and base parametric distribution F b 0 as follows: biFb=trues=1qsδθs,2emqs=Wstruel=1s1false(1Wlfalse),2emWsBetafalse(1,αbfalse),2emθsFb0, where δ θ is a point mass at θ and all W s 's and θ s 's are independent. Note that the DP assigned to F b relaxes the distribution assumption of the cluster size model, which is important in light of the work of Chen et al (). Our model imposes two different latent groupings of the clusters (i.e., litters): The nested KSBP allows a group of clusters to share the same distribution for the subject‐specific random effects (the U i j 's) and the DP allows a group of clusters to share the same latent covariate value b i (e.g., certain dams may share the same unmeasured pregnancy complication, which could affect litter size and fetal outcomes).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Explicitly creating a model for the intervisit times and incorporating it in a model for the outcomes of interest would be especially difficult given the “spells” of concentrated visits. We note that Chen et al showed that misspecification of the joint distribution of the outcome and number of visits can produce biased estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Chen et al . () further studied the robustness of the SRPM under model misspecification. Seaman et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%