2011
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2010.2066557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Joint Fusion, Power Allocation and Delay Optimization Approach for Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cluster of a WSN was considered in [ 14 ] where sensor nodes collect and transmit data to the fusion center of the cluster directly or through relay nodes. Relay nodes amplify and forward data to the fusion center or the next relay node.…”
Section: Fusion Of Delay Sensitive Noise Perturbed Data Sensed Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A cluster of a WSN was considered in [ 14 ] where sensor nodes collect and transmit data to the fusion center of the cluster directly or through relay nodes. Relay nodes amplify and forward data to the fusion center or the next relay node.…”
Section: Fusion Of Delay Sensitive Noise Perturbed Data Sensed Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers selected for this review and tutorial are based on how well they covered the topics of interest and the degree to which they highlight the key design issues for WSN. In part III of this paper, we expose the reader to the following design problems in WSNs: routing for multi-hop WSNs with a single immobile sink [ 2 ], routing in a delay-tolerant WSN with a single mobile sink [ 3 ], joint routing, power and bandwidth allocation in FDMA WSNs [ 4 ], joint energy allocation and routing in WSNs with rechargeable batteries [ 5 ], routing in multi-hop single fixed sink with different objectives under distance uncertainties [ 6 ], joint routing and scheduling in WSNs with multiple sinks with different sink location possibilities [ 7 ], delay sensitive routing for underwater WSNs [ 8 ], using mobile radio frequency (RF) power charger to charge the batteries of sensors in a WSN [ 9 ], assignment of data processing tasks across the nodes in WSN [ 10 ], hierarchical clustering in a heterogeneous network [ 11 ], energy efficient co-operative broadcasting at the symbol level [ 12 ], dispatching of mobile sensor nodes in a WSN to sense a particular region of interest [ 13 ], fusion of delay sensitive noise perturbed data sensed by different nodes in a given cluster [ 14 ], Energy Optimization in Wireless Visual Sensor Networks While Maintaining Image Quality [ 15 ]. …”
Section: Part I Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data delay can be defined as the duration of messages, which is transferred from sensor nodes to sink. And the data delay by TDMA takes place in three stages: data queuing, data transmission and radio propagation [19]. The delay in queuing depends on how long the message wait for transferring in sensor nodes, the delay of data transmission corresponds to the duration sensor nodes is used to transmit data in the scheduled slots, and radio propagation is the duration for signal disseminates to sink node.…”
Section: B Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18], global probability of error and energy consumption have been optimized, in their work, the optimization is investigated and solved for two types of fusion schemes which contain parallel decision and serial decision fusion. Mingdong Xu and Henry Leung proposed a cross-layer optimization of wireless sensor networks under the constraints of total energy consumption and transmission delay [19]. In [20], L.Liu et al…”
Section: Iintroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their work assumed that the sensors are communicating on the dedicated channels. Cross-layer optimization of fusion, power allocation and delay for a cognitive sensor network is given in [21], where the goal is to minimize the mean distortion of the system under constraints on the total energy consumption and the total delay. The work, however, did not consider any spectrum access and interference issues for the primary user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%