2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17697.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A joint analysis of BLAST 250-500 μm and LABOCA 870 μm observations in the Extended Chandra Deep Field-South

Abstract: We present a joint analysis of the overlapping Balloon-borne Large Aperture Submillimetre Telescope (BLAST) 250, 350, 500 μm, and LABOCA 870 μm observations [from the LABOCA ECDFS Submm Survey (LESS) survey] of the Extended Chandra Deep Field-South. Out to z ∼ 3, the BLAST filters sample near the peak wavelength of thermal far-infrared (FIR) emission from galaxies (rest-frame wavelengths ∼60-200 μm), primarily produced by dust heated through absorption in star-forming clouds. However, identifying counterparts … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig. 5, the dust temperature follows the well-known temperature-luminosity relation found in previous studies ( Fig 5), however, their sample peaks at lower redshift (∼ 0.85 vs ∼ 2.3) and it is selected at shorter wavelengths, so the differences can be explained by selection effects (see discussions by Chapin et al 2011, Marsden et al 2011, and Casey et al 2012.…”
Section: Dust Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As shown in Fig. 5, the dust temperature follows the well-known temperature-luminosity relation found in previous studies ( Fig 5), however, their sample peaks at lower redshift (∼ 0.85 vs ∼ 2.3) and it is selected at shorter wavelengths, so the differences can be explained by selection effects (see discussions by Chapin et al 2011, Marsden et al 2011, and Casey et al 2012.…”
Section: Dust Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Since the noise consists of both instrumental noise and confusion noise from the background of undetected sources, we follow the approach of Chapin et al (2011) to calculate the optimal matched filter in each of the three SPIRE bands. Details of the estimation and form of the matched filter are discussed in V16.…”
Section: Source Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conley et al 2011;Rangwala et al 2011) and adopted κ 850 µm = 0.15 m 2 kg −1 (Weingartner & Draine 2001;Dunne et al 2003). Dust emissivity, β, being poorly constrained by our data, was fixed to values of 1.5, 2.0 or 2.5 (Dunne & Eales 2001;Magnelli et al 2012;Casey et al 2011;Chapin et al 2011;Walter et al 2012).…”
Section: Modified Blackbody Fitsmentioning
confidence: 99%