2007
DOI: 10.1086/520912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASpitzerIRAC Census of the Asymptotic Giant Branch Populations in Local Group Dwarfs. II. IC 1613

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing their IR data to the optical data of Albert et al (2000), Jackson et al (2007b) found that Albert et al (2000) had detected only 50% of the AGB population. Furthermore, Jackson et al (2007b) estimated that as Albert et al (2000) applied a blue limit in (R − I) when selecting AGB candidates they actually used only 18% of the AGB population when calculating the global C/M ratio. The poor AGB detection rate reported for Albert et al (2000) was repeated when comparing the IRAC data to other optical data sets in IC 1613 and in other dwarf galaxies (Jackson et al 2007a;Boyer et al 2009).…”
Section: Albert Et Al (2000)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing their IR data to the optical data of Albert et al (2000), Jackson et al (2007b) found that Albert et al (2000) had detected only 50% of the AGB population. Furthermore, Jackson et al (2007b) estimated that as Albert et al (2000) applied a blue limit in (R − I) when selecting AGB candidates they actually used only 18% of the AGB population when calculating the global C/M ratio. The poor AGB detection rate reported for Albert et al (2000) was repeated when comparing the IRAC data to other optical data sets in IC 1613 and in other dwarf galaxies (Jackson et al 2007a;Boyer et al 2009).…”
Section: Albert Et Al (2000)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is still not clear, but is possibly due to the underestimation of the mass-loss rates at low metallicities. As a concurring factor, the circumstellar extinction presently assumed in the models may be somewhat underestimated, as suggested by the Spitzer observations of nearby dwarf irregulars by Jackson et al (2007aJackson et al ( , 2007b and Boyer et al (2009a). Regardless, it is likely that the problem is limited to low metallicities, since the MG07 TP-AGB models have been calibrated in the intermediate-metallicity Magellanic Clouds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several dwarf galaxies in and around the Local Group are suitable, but their large distances make IR observations difficult. A few studies (Jackson et al 2007a(Jackson et al , 2007bBoyer et al 2009;Davidge 2014;Jones et al 2014) have statistically inferred the presence of dust-producing AGB stars in several star-forming dwarf galaxies, but were unable to identify individual dusty stars due both to confusion with unresolved background galaxies and to substantial circumstellar extinction at optical wavelengths. At these distances, additional information is necessary to confidently identify individual dusty AGB stars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%