2015
DOI: 10.1177/0146621615622635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Q3-Based Permutation Test for Assessing Local Independence

Abstract: Item response theory (IRT) is a powerful statistical methodology used in the analysis of psychological and educational assessments. IRT rests on three fundamental assumptions about the data, including local independence, which means that after accounting for the latent trait(s) being measured, the item responses are independent of one another. Traditionally, this assumption is assessed using Yen's statistic. However, does not have a known sampling distribution, and thus, it is typically used in a descriptive f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the parameter ranges that were tested, any residual correlation .0.2 above the average correlation would appear to indicate LD, and any residual correlation of independent items at a value .0.3 above the average would seem unlikely. Finch and Jeffers (2016) proposed a permutation test for LD based on the Q 3 and found it to have good Type I error control, while also yielding more power for detecting LD than the use of the 0.2 cut-value. Bootstrapping and determining critical values for the Q 3 is one option, but using one of the statistics with known null distribution listed in the introduction is a better option.…”
Section: Summary and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the parameter ranges that were tested, any residual correlation .0.2 above the average correlation would appear to indicate LD, and any residual correlation of independent items at a value .0.3 above the average would seem unlikely. Finch and Jeffers (2016) proposed a permutation test for LD based on the Q 3 and found it to have good Type I error control, while also yielding more power for detecting LD than the use of the 0.2 cut-value. Bootstrapping and determining critical values for the Q 3 is one option, but using one of the statistics with known null distribution listed in the introduction is a better option.…”
Section: Summary and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items generated from the same item model were used as testlets. Average Q 3 -values within and between testlets were 0.128 and 0.028, respectively; as these were both smaller than the critical value of 0.2 (Chen and Thissen, 1997; Makransky et al, 2014; Finch and Jeffers, 2016), we concluded that there was negligible dependence between items from the same item models and between items from different item models. Therefore, we were convinced that the assumption of the local independence of items was not violated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…A Q 3 statistic was proposed by Yen (1984) to detect local independence of IRT. If the Q 3 value of an item was larger than an arbitrary cut value, it meant the item had local dependence (Finch & Jeffers, 2016). As Flens et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Q 3 statistic was proposed by Yen (1984) to detect local independence of IRT. If the Q 3 value of an item was larger than an arbitrary cut value, it meant the item had local dependence (Finch & Jeffers, 2016). As Flens et al (2016) pointed out that the value of Q 3 above 0.36 represents a moderate deviation or dependence, therefore in this article, items with a Q 3 value larger than 0.36 were removed from the item bank to ensure all remaining items met the IRT assumption of local independence.…”
Section: Local Independencementioning
confidence: 99%