2019
DOI: 10.1177/1461444819892283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ahyper differential counterpublic: Muslim social media users and Islamophobia during the 2016 US presidential election

Abstract: We interviewed 61 Muslims in 15 focus groups from the most visible Muslim population in the United States: the Detroit Metropolitan Area. Participants shared their experiences of and responses to Islamophobia on social media and face-to-face during the 2016 US presidential election campaign and aftermath. Applying Fraser’s and Squires’ theories of counterpublics, we developed an adapted understanding of counterpublics in collapsed contexts of online and face-to-face spaces. We argue that everyday Muslim intern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New media studies on Islam have been empirically focused on a range of practices and discourses, including Islamic activism (Eckert et al, 2019;Sumiala & Korpiola, 2017), online militaristic discourse (Kepel & Ghazaleh, 2004;Pennington & Krona, 2019), dynamics of Islamic authority (Bunt, 2003;Turner, 2007;Bunt, 2018), the role of Internet to eradicate misrepresentations of Islam (Larsson, 2007), and virtual Islamic discussion groups (Kesvani, 2019;Larsson, 2016). Eickelman and Anderson (2003) identify cyberspace as an emerging public sphere that attempts to "re-intellectualize Islam" through pushing the discourse on Islam beyond the confines of institutionalized voices.…”
Section: New Media and Islammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New media studies on Islam have been empirically focused on a range of practices and discourses, including Islamic activism (Eckert et al, 2019;Sumiala & Korpiola, 2017), online militaristic discourse (Kepel & Ghazaleh, 2004;Pennington & Krona, 2019), dynamics of Islamic authority (Bunt, 2003;Turner, 2007;Bunt, 2018), the role of Internet to eradicate misrepresentations of Islam (Larsson, 2007), and virtual Islamic discussion groups (Kesvani, 2019;Larsson, 2016). Eickelman and Anderson (2003) identify cyberspace as an emerging public sphere that attempts to "re-intellectualize Islam" through pushing the discourse on Islam beyond the confines of institutionalized voices.…”
Section: New Media and Islammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muslims were associated with “terrorism, injustice, backwardness, insecurity and alienation” ( Sharifi et al., 2017 ). Another research articlehighlighted Muslims' experience with and responses to Islamophobia online and in face-to-face encounters in the US, and it was found that every Muslim internet user in the US had experienced hyper differential public encounters ( Eckert et al., 2021 ). Moosavi (2015a) examined the speeches of British Cabinet ministers of the Labour Government (2001–2007) revealing that mainstream politicians of Labour Government stigmatized Islam and Muslims and did nothing to diminish Islamophobia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different people may deal with seemingly similar situations by choosing from strategies across this continuum. For example, some Muslims in the U.S. unfriend or unfollow Islamophobic users, but other Muslim users feel the need to delete the Facebook app altogether (Eckert et al, 2019). Conceptually, we argue that agency is expressed by the choice of (non-)use strategies motivated by particular social contexts.…”
Section: Contextual (Non-)use Vs Absolute Non-usementioning
confidence: 87%