2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2012.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hysteresis functional link artificial neural network for identification and model predictive control of SMA actuator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining Equations (18) and (19), it can be concluded that when the identified parameters of PMPI model meet the condition (16), I-M compensator is globally stable.…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combining Equations (18) and (19), it can be concluded that when the identified parameters of PMPI model meet the condition (16), I-M compensator is globally stable.…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the high accuracy and flexibility, the phenomenological model is more popular in hysteresis modeling. The phenomenological models include Preisach model [11,12], polynomial model [13,14], Bouc-Wen model [15,16], Duhem model [17,18], neural network model [19,20], Prandtl-Ishlinskii (PI) model [21][22][23], and etc. Among them, because of simple expression and analytical inverse model, the PI model is the most widely used in hysteresis modeling and compensation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenological models, such as Preisach model [11], [12], Krasnoselskii-Pokrovskii model [13], Prandtl-Ishlinskii model [14], etc., describe the hysteresis by a collection of weighted elementary functions. The complex and generally multidimensional structure of this method makes it difficult to tune the parameters in real time to meet the change of the operating environment of SMA actuators [15], [16]. The physical models, on the other hand, including Duhem model [17], Bouc-Wen model [18], Liang model [19], [20], and other empirical models [21], [22], describe the SMA behavior based on its physical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this problem, proportional-integral-derivate (PID) controllers with hysteresis models have been implemented [18,19,20]; for position control of SMA actuators using the generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii inverse model [18], for micro-positioning control of SMA actuators by modeling the hysteresis using NNs [19], and for magnetic SMA actuators by using a radial basis function NN to obtain the Jacobian information of the system in order to adjust the controller parameters [20]. In addition, neural network controllers, previously trained to identify the system were proposed to control SMA actuators [21,22,23,24]; using the inverse of the ANN that replicate the dynamics of the SMA force actuator to implement the controller [21], implementing a model predictive controller based on a functional link ANN to control the linear memory metal actuator displacement [22], and realizing a recurrent neural model predictive, variable structure, controller designed to control a one degree of freedom (1-DOF) rotary manipulator actuated by an SMA wire [23,24]. The main disadvantages of these recurrent neural network controllers are the complexity of the control system, and the requirement of training the neural network, to identify the system, prior to the implementation of the control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%