A hypothetical improvement of the quadruple helix model of innovation

Abstract

Innovation model formation is complex, and the useful QH model can develop and improve to be exemplary. Motivation for the study:The rationale of the study is to validate and improve the QH model with additional concepts, fresh perspectives of experts and the investigation of the primary sub-revolutions forging innovation.Research design, approach and method: A conceptual and critical review approach implied narrative data of the model from secondary sources; a convenience sample of five innovation experts for critical reviews was thematically analysed.Main findings: Ultimately, the improved QH model must accommodate the legal, moral and ethical world to merge with the physical, biological and digital worlds; appropriate terminology for QH innovation leadership is needed, and triple technology theory (TTT) should be incorporated with the triple management theory (TMT) dimension of the model; the review conformed the sub-revolutions of innovation with respect to (1) innovation leadership, upscaling agility and innovation essentials, (2) the triple helix (TH) ecosystems sub-revolution and epochal society and (3) the new technological paradigm, technology intensity and TMT. Practical/managerial implications:The already useful QH model is confirmed and may develop to become exemplary with respect to the hypothetical improvements suggested. Contribution/value-add:A fresh and improved QH model is suggested in the context of complex innovation model formation and the paucity of literature.

Management leadership in the New Mexican School and teacher revaluation from the recognition of human talent: a scoping review

“…Los estudios consultados demuestran que el liderazgo, el sentido de comunidad y el trabajo mancomunado, no solo contribuyen a evitar fenómenos como el burnout, sino que favorecen el tránsito de valores y creencias humanistas a la acción, en un contexto de colaboración y satisfacción laboral (Gutiérrez-González et al, 2023;Mercer, 2021;Yan et al, 2021). Estos hallazgos son especialmente relevantes en la era del tránsito acelerado entre revoluciones industriales y nuevas asociaciones entre la educación, la sociedad, el gobierno y la industria, así como la igual de acelerada transformación digital (Scuotto et al, 2023;Schalkwyk et al, 2022).…”