2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2011.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hyper-heuristic for the Longest Common Subsequence problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm can learn during the search process, whose procedure is better for a particular instance or at a particular time (more on hyper-heuristics can be found in [ 34 36 ]). Hyper-heuristics have already been successfully applied to some bioinformatics problems (e.g., [ 37 39 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm can learn during the search process, whose procedure is better for a particular instance or at a particular time (more on hyper-heuristics can be found in [ 34 36 ]). Hyper-heuristics have already been successfully applied to some bioinformatics problems (e.g., [ 37 39 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LCS algorithm is a similarity measure that is successfully used for sequence matching (Nyirarugira and Kim, 2015). The LCS algorithm aims to find a common subsequence with the longest possible length in two sequences (Chowdhury vd., 2014;Tabataba and Mousavi, 2012). As it is seen in Equation ( 3), the algorithm needs to be repeated until all characters are matched.…”
Section: Longest Common Subsequence Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For arbitrary number of sequences, the problem of computing an LCS is NP-hard [28]. As a result a number of heuristic and/or meta-heuristic techniques have also been applied in the literature to solve the LCS problem for arbitrary number of sequences (e.g., [7,31,34,35]). The related problem of global alignment, which is more relevant in computational biology, has also received much attention in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%