2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid user similarity model for collaborative filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most relevant works to us are BCF [14] and HUSM [20], which predict user similarity by utilizing all ratings of each user and Figure 2: An illustration of our basic philosophy to evaluate user distance. The bigger the square the larger the item distance d(i, j), e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The most relevant works to us are BCF [14] and HUSM [20], which predict user similarity by utilizing all ratings of each user and Figure 2: An illustration of our basic philosophy to evaluate user distance. The bigger the square the larger the item distance d(i, j), e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller d(i, j) the more similar i and j. We can derive d(i, j) from ratings on items [14,20] or content information [22], such as item tags, comments, etc. In this paper, we assume d(i, j) are given.…”
Section: The Proposed Similarity Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations