AIAA Infotech@Aerospace Conference 2009
DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-1976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Symbolic and Sub-Symbolic Intelligent System for Mobile Robots

Abstract: This paper describes our latest efforts to extend the Symbolic and Sub-symbolic Robotics Intelligence Control System (SS-RICS). Our initial development included five design guidelines for a generalized intelligence system and those guidelines are discussed in relationship to the current improvements and extensions. We also discuss recent exercises at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) robotics test facility as well as the addition of Decision Field Theory (DFT) into the architecture. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The field of AI has not produced very intelligent systems, because it has been too focused on symbolic processing. Even cognitive architectures (e.g., [63], executive-process/interactive control (EPIC) [64], state operator and result (Soar) [65,66], symbolic and subsymbolic robotic intelligence control system (SS-RICS) [66,67], and adaptive control of thought-rational (ACT-R) [68,69]), which have been implemented on mobile robots [66,70], are not even close to human intelligence and power and have only rudimentary learning ability. Engineers involved in computational intelligence are more focused on subsymbolic processes such as neural networks, genetic algorithms, and fuzzy logic, which may lead to large-scale intelligent systems.…”
Section: Computer Science and Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of AI has not produced very intelligent systems, because it has been too focused on symbolic processing. Even cognitive architectures (e.g., [63], executive-process/interactive control (EPIC) [64], state operator and result (Soar) [65,66], symbolic and subsymbolic robotic intelligence control system (SS-RICS) [66,67], and adaptive control of thought-rational (ACT-R) [68,69]), which have been implemented on mobile robots [66,70], are not even close to human intelligence and power and have only rudimentary learning ability. Engineers involved in computational intelligence are more focused on subsymbolic processes such as neural networks, genetic algorithms, and fuzzy logic, which may lead to large-scale intelligent systems.…”
Section: Computer Science and Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SS-RICS can also access "concepts" which are long term facts; similar to declarative memories within ACT-R, but within SS-RICS they are considered long term memories (i.e., memories which do not decay). SS-RICS can also generate productions automatically in order to generalize [17]. SS-RICS has two types of processes for the symbolic generation of new productions, top-down learning and bottom-up learning.…”
Section: Hybrid Approach To Complex Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of these are Soar [14], ACT-R [15], and EPIC [16]. Some of these have been implemented on mobile robots [4,17].…”
Section: Cognitive Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The architecture of SS-RICS [48,51] shown in Figure 5 is one attempt at a general-purpose intelligent system. This system uses a cognitive architecture (based on ACT/R) for decision making but allows for sub-symbolic processing, such as neural networks, for processing sensor data.…”
Section: An Engineering Approach To Developing Conscious Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%