2020
DOI: 10.1109/jetcas.2020.2970080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Strategy for the Discovery and Design of Photonic Structures

Abstract: Designing complex physical systems, including photonic structures, is typically a tedious trial-and-error process that requires extensive simulations with iterative sweeps in multidimensional parameter space. To circumvent this conventional approach and substantially expedite the discovery and development of photonic nanostructures, here we develop a framework leveraging both a deep generative model and a modified evolution strategy to automate the inverse design of engineered nanophotonic materials. The capac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the relative ease with which standard ML techniques can be adapted and applied to PhCs, as shown here, suggests a promising application space for datadriven approaches in photonics more generally. Especially within generative modeling, a large suite of ML techniques exists that point to several opportunities for data-driven inverse photonic design, some of which have already been explored: among them, variational autoencoders [69] exemplify a natural alternative [70] to GANs for photonic inverse design [71,72], as does the related approach of bidirectional neural networks [73,74]. Further, the ML application-space for PhCs extends beyond the periodic settings considered here: for instance, both isolated and aperiodic systems, such as PhC defect cavities and quasiperiodic PhCs, may be explored with similar ML techniques, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the relative ease with which standard ML techniques can be adapted and applied to PhCs, as shown here, suggests a promising application space for datadriven approaches in photonics more generally. Especially within generative modeling, a large suite of ML techniques exists that point to several opportunities for data-driven inverse photonic design, some of which have already been explored: among them, variational autoencoders [69] exemplify a natural alternative [70] to GANs for photonic inverse design [71,72], as does the related approach of bidirectional neural networks [73,74]. Further, the ML application-space for PhCs extends beyond the periodic settings considered here: for instance, both isolated and aperiodic systems, such as PhC defect cavities and quasiperiodic PhCs, may be explored with similar ML techniques, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though no generalized and fast inverse design method has as yet been reported, rapid progress has been made in this direction over the last two years. 13,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] The overall trend in these studies so far is, that for every specific inverse problem using a particular geometric model, a neural network needs to be designed in a time demanding and computationally very expensive process, involving hyper-parameter optimization, training data generation, training and extensive testing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we can observe, the two distinct topologies can be smoothly transformed by linearly interpolating their latent vectors. This property is indispensable for the fast convergence when evolution strategy (ES) is utilized for the topology optimization 32 . It is noteworthy that linear interpolation does not always result in continuous topological transformation, especially when the latent space is high dimensional and the topologies of the two patterns are significantly distinct.…”
Section: B Continuity Of the Latent Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to globally optimize the topology of the grating patterns, we adopt the modified evolution strategy (ES) 32 as shown in Fig. 3(c).…”
Section: Designing Non-paraxial Diffractive Optical Elements (Does)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation