2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.117333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid sectional moment projection method for discrete population balance dynamics involving inception, growth, coagulation and fragmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The onset of high-speed computing has facilitate many researchers to work on the solutions of different types of PBEs as they bear significant responsibilities in different manufacturing units as well as in CFD-simulations. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] However, the complicated nature of the PBE models has rendered the search for exact solutions within a few number of simple kernels. [24][25][26] Therefore, numerical methods are required to solve the PBEs.…”
Section: Literature Review and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The onset of high-speed computing has facilitate many researchers to work on the solutions of different types of PBEs as they bear significant responsibilities in different manufacturing units as well as in CFD-simulations. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] However, the complicated nature of the PBE models has rendered the search for exact solutions within a few number of simple kernels. [24][25][26] Therefore, numerical methods are required to solve the PBEs.…”
Section: Literature Review and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve the PBE, there are different solution approaches in literature, such as lattice Boltzmann method [7] , [8] , sectional method [9] , [10] and homotopy method [10] , [11] . A critical review that provides a comprehensive analysis of the state of the art in numerical approaches with emphasis in algorithmic details and their applications for solving PBEs can be found in Singh et al [12] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These existing analytical solutions are of great significance and can be used as a useful benchmark for validating different numerical methods. Different numerical approaches aiming at different problems of aerosol dynamics are developed to approximate the solution of the GDE for an aerosol system of interest, such as the sectional method (SM) (Gelbard et al , 1980; Prakash et al , 2003; Zhang et al , 2020; Wu et al , 2022), method of moments (MOMs) (Frenklach and Harris, 1987; McGraw, 1997; Yu et al , 2008; Yu and Chan, 2015; Chan et al , 2018; Li et al , 2019; Liu et al , 2019c; Shen et al , 2020; Yang et al , 2020; Jiang et al , 2021; Shen et al , 2022) and Monte Carlo (MC) method (Gillespie, 1975; Garcia et al , 1987; Liffman, 1992; Smith and Matsoukas, 1998; Kruis et al , 2000; Lin et al , 2002; Zhao et al , 2009; Xu et al , 2014; Kotalczyk and Kruis, 2017; Liu and Chan, 2017; Liu and Chan, 2018a, 2018b; Liu et al , 2019a, 2019b; Liu and Chan, 2020; Liu et al , 2021; Jiang and Chan, 2021; Liu et al , 2022). As the discrete nature of the MC method perfectly matches the stochastic properties of particle motion, it can be used to closely simulate the behaviour of particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%