2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2019.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid numerical-semi-analytical method for computer simulations of groundwater flow and heat transfer in geothermal borehole fields

Abstract: The formulation of a hybrid numerical-semi-analytical method for cost-effective simulations of heat transfer in fields of vertical geothermal boreholes, in the presence of groundwater flow, is presented. An amalgamation of a co-located control-volume finite element method and a finite volume method is used to solve 1) a volume-averaged continuity and the Darcy-Brinkman-Frochheimer equations to obtain the distribution of the groundwater flow; and 2) an unsteady three-dimensional volume-averaged advection-conduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With these results, the use of methods such as thermal resistance capacitance (TRC) methods should be revisited when including groundwater flow, as the delta-circuit is not always valid. Extending the method from 2D to 3D including thermal interactions between boreholes and time-dependent fluid temperatures could be done using a segmented MFLS solution (Cimmino and Baliga, 2019) and a modified equivalent borehole method (Prieto and Cimmino, 2021b) with a coefficient updating scheme as done in Cimmino (2021a, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these results, the use of methods such as thermal resistance capacitance (TRC) methods should be revisited when including groundwater flow, as the delta-circuit is not always valid. Extending the method from 2D to 3D including thermal interactions between boreholes and time-dependent fluid temperatures could be done using a segmented MFLS solution (Cimmino and Baliga, 2019) and a modified equivalent borehole method (Prieto and Cimmino, 2021b) with a coefficient updating scheme as done in Cimmino (2021a, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modules were presented in an earlier publication (Cimmino, 2018b), except for the networks and media modules introduced in versions 1.1.1 and 2.0, respectively. The networks module enables the configuration of piping connections between boreholes and the evaluation of 𝑔-functions for mixed parallel and series connections between boreholes (Cimmino, 2019), including fields of coaxial boreholes since version 2.1. The media module gives access to fluid properties using CoolProp (Bell et al, 2014).…”
Section: New Features and Changes To Existing Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gfunction module was refactored to replace the dedicated functions for different boundary conditions by a single class that can handle all calculation options. pygfunction supports 3 boundary conditions: uniform and equal heat extraction rates , uniform and equal borehole wall temperatures , and mixed inlet fluid temperatures (Cimmino, 2019). When computing 𝑔-functions, a user might use a combination of the boreholes, pipes, networks and media modules to define the borefield, depending on the chosen boundary condition, and use the gfunction module to evaluate the 𝑔-functions.…”
Section: New Features and Changes To Existing Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another type of hybrid model couples analytical solution with numerical algorithm. Recently, Cimmino and Baliga [32] developed a relatively cost-effective hybrid method for vertical BHEs along with groundwater flow, where the numerical results from a co-located FEM and finite volume method were marched with thermal resistance models. The hybrid approach can also march two spatial dimensions (so-called "1+1D algorithm") to greatly increase the computational efficiency compared with solving a full-scale model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%