A hybrid multi‐criteria decision‐making approach to evaluate interrelationships and impacts of supply chain performance factors on pharmaceutical industry

Abstract

Pharmaceutical Supply Chain (PSC) plays a critical role in the healthcare sector. This study identifies, validates, and prioritises the factors that play a crucial role in PSC performance, adopting a threefold approach. In the first stage performance, indicators were identified through an extensive review of the literature. With the help of expert opinion, the identified factors were validated and then categorised based on technological—organisational—environmental (TOE) and supply chain (SC) theories to propose a framework. The Pakistani Pharmaceutical sector firms were selected to investigate the cause and effect relationship among the factors, their interdependencies, and impact on overall PSC performance. This investigation was supported by a novel integrated analytic model composed of best worst method (BWM), decision‐making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), and analytical network process (ANP) methods. The results indicate that ‘human resource skills, competencies, and involvement’, ‘process improvement and healthcare reform, and manufacturing’, and ‘distribution and inventory management’ are the top three factors that have a high impact on the overall PSC performance. This study outcome help inform decision‐makers and managers in the healthcare sector in formulating strategies to improve their SC performance.

Evaluation and Selection of a Cybersecurity Platform ─ Case of the Power Sector in India

“…Through pairwise comparisons, the BWM model makes it easier to compare and rank alternatives based on various criteria. Moreover, it assists in structuring decision-making issues and establishing the relative weight of multiple considerations [70]. The subsequent steps outline the BWM methodology: (i) Determine the best and worst criterion: Let the whole set of 'n' criteria be denoted as 𝐶 1 , 𝐶 2 , … , 𝐶 𝑛 .…”

A Comprehensive Review of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods: Advancements, Applications, and Future Directions

“…Fuzzy-based MCDM methods have been applied in project evaluation and selection processes, where decision-makers need to assess and rank alternative projects based on multiple criteria. In the study by Khan et al [31], a fuzzy TOPSIS method was employed to evaluate and prioritize potential construction projects considering factors such as cost, schedule, quality, and environmental impact. The fuzzy TOPSIS approach allowed decision-makers to handle the uncertainties and imprecisions associated with the project evaluation criteria, resulting in more accurate and reliable project selection outcomes.…”

The validity study of a channel‐based demand estimation ANP model

“…Because of the capability of quantifying the subjective criteria, examining difficult decisions under uncertainty, and simplicity, these techniques are used in many research papers in a wide variety of fields. For example, AHP and ANP models are applied in construction project (Gashaw & Jilcha, 2022), financial investment (Çalık et al, 2019), location problem (Bottero & Ferretti, 2011), supplier selection (Kasirian et al, 2013), scheduling (Momoh & Zhu, 2003), performance indicator selection in the healthcare sector (Khan et al, 2022; Moons et al, 2019), deciding on copyrights on the Internet (Andreichicova & Andreichicov, 2012), and industry 4.0 implementation (Nimawat & Gidwani, 2021). Due to their applicability in variety of areas, some studies have proposed the algorithms to ease the process of the AHP and ANP structure design (e.g., Ergu et al, 2011; Khademi et al, 2012).…”