2019
DOI: 10.1002/mde.3113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid multi‐attribute decision‐making procedure for ranking project proposals: A historical data perspective

Abstract: This paper develops a hybrid multiattribute decision‐making methodology for ranking project proposals (PPs) through a judicious usage of historical data of completed projects to determine attribute weights, enabling elimination of problems associated with projected data such as cost and schedule overruns of real‐world projects. The weights generated from data envelopment analysis are explicitly utilized for ranking PPs while allowing subjectivity to be ingeniously incorporated into the decision process. The ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DEA is an optimization approach proven for its strength in evaluating performance of decision making units (DMUs) that employ multiple inputs to produce multiple outputs (Sow et al, 2016;Oukil & Al-Zidi, 2018;Soltani et al, 2021). Moreover, DEA has the potential to categorize DMUs as efficient or inefficient without a need for a priori preference settings on inputs and outputs (Oukil & Govindaluri, 2020;Al-Mezeini et al, 2020;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DEA is an optimization approach proven for its strength in evaluating performance of decision making units (DMUs) that employ multiple inputs to produce multiple outputs (Sow et al, 2016;Oukil & Al-Zidi, 2018;Soltani et al, 2021). Moreover, DEA has the potential to categorize DMUs as efficient or inefficient without a need for a priori preference settings on inputs and outputs (Oukil & Govindaluri, 2020;Al-Mezeini et al, 2020;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, compared with the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, a multiobjective decision analysis method (such as technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution [TOPSIS]) emerges as a suitable alternative for GVC investment decision making (Eric Afful‐Dadzie, 2016). As TOPSIS is widely used in multiobjective decision analysis (Jahanshahloo, Lotfi, & Izadikhah, 2006; Oukil & Govindaluri, 2019), it fits in the GVC's need to select the best option according to the closeness between a limited set of alternatives and idealized objectives (Lai, Liu, & Hwang, 1994; Oukil & Govindaluri, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) problems generally exist in various fields such as economy, education, management and the military. Therefore, MADM is essential in decision-making theory and method research [1]. MADM is a limited option selection problem related to multiple attributes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%