2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2996643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Modular Approach for Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis

Abstract: Over the years, several approaches have been developed for the quantitative analysis of dynamic fault trees (DFTs). These approaches have strong theoretical and mathematical foundations; however, they appear to suffer from the state-space explosion and high computational requirements, compromising their efficacy. Modularisation techniques have been developed to address these issues by identifying and quantifying static and dynamic modules of the fault tree separately by using binary decision diagrams and Marko… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen from Fig 4, the BPNN includes an input layer, hidden layer and output layer. Formula (17) describes the feature delivered from the input layer to the hidden layer:…”
Section: B Refined Model Of the Transformer Failure Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As seen from Fig 4, the BPNN includes an input layer, hidden layer and output layer. Formula (17) describes the feature delivered from the input layer to the hidden layer:…”
Section: B Refined Model Of the Transformer Failure Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the content of the dissolved gases has a tight connection to the fault type and fault severity of the transformers [11]. By now, DGA data has been widely applied in the transformer faults diagnostics and remaining useful life (RUL) estimation aided by some powerful machine learning algorithms such as dynamic bayesian networks and temporal fault trees [13]- [17]. [1] captures the qualitative causal relationship between dissolved gases and transformer faults, then a probabilistic diagnosis framework is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, DFT is the most widely used in engineering, while FPN method has irreplaceable and important advantages, which make up for the deficiency of fault trees in practical application. DFT method and FPN method have achieved some research results in the field of fault diagnosis and reliability analysis of complex systems as well as their combination with each other [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volk et al [1] have presented a DFT modeling approach, which can serve to provide additional insights into the criticality of field elements, for infrastructure reliability analysis of railway station areas. Kabir et al [2] have proposed a hybrid modularization scheme where independent sub-trees of a DFT are identified and quantified in a hierarchical order. This method could provide an approximate solution to DFTs without unacceptable loss of accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%