2016
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1200159
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid model for spatially and temporally resolved ozone exposures in the continental United States

Abstract: Ground-level ozone is an important atmospheric oxidant, which exhibits considerable spatial and temporal variability in its concentration level. Existing modeling approaches for ground-level ozone include chemical transport models, land-use regression, Kriging, and data fusion of chemical transport models with monitoring data. Each of these methods has both strengths and weaknesses. Combining those complementary approaches could improve model performance. Meanwhile, satellite-based total column ozone, combined… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
77
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
8
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Details have been published elsewhere. 12,13 Warm season is defined to be from April 1 to September 30, which is the specific time window to examine the association between ozone and mortality. Meteorological variables including air and dew point temperatures were retrieved from North American Regional Reanalysis data and estimated daily mean values were determined for each 32 km × 32 km grid in the continental US.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details have been published elsewhere. 12,13 Warm season is defined to be from April 1 to September 30, which is the specific time window to examine the association between ozone and mortality. Meteorological variables including air and dew point temperatures were retrieved from North American Regional Reanalysis data and estimated daily mean values were determined for each 32 km × 32 km grid in the continental US.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with PM 2.5 and PM 10 , there are very few studies applying machine-learning methods to predict coarse PM [20], NO 2 [50], or O 3 [19] at fine spatiotemporal resolution over large geographical areas, and none of them conducted in Sweden. In a previous study conducted in Italy, we applied the same methodology proposed here to predict coarse PM, and we were able to predict 77% of PM 2.5-10 variability in OOB samples and 62% in held-out monitors [20].…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ozone levels are much higher today than in the pre-industrial era, and there are concerns of future increases related to global warming [18]. However, predicting ozone concentrations at fine spatial and temporal concentrations is extremely difficult because many parameters related to local sources, land-use characteristics, and meteorological conditions are involved in ozone formation and removal, resulting in high spatial and temporal variability [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods such as canonical correlation analysis or graphical least angle regression (graphical LASSO) techniques can enable investigators to map one large data set (e.g., external exposures) to another (e.g., internal exposures) (13), but missing are methods to consider longitudinal data. Computational methods enjoying a resurgence in the data science community, such as neural networks, may also be harnessed to assimilate data over different dimensions (11). …”
Section: What Is the Human Exposome Data Structure?mentioning
confidence: 99%