2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2868374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid MCDM Approach for Large Group Green Supplier Selection With Uncertain Linguistic Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, there are five candidate alternatives in Z, i.e., Z = {z 1 , z 2 , ⋯ , z 5 }. Suppose that the decision-maker e k provides his/her confirmed preference relations z 3 ≻z 1 , z 2 ≻z 4 , and z 3 ≻z 4 , i.e., Ω k = {(3, 1), (2,4), (3,4)}. In this case, there are only three paired comparison judgments in Ω k .…”
Section: Mcgdm Problem Under Pf Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, there are five candidate alternatives in Z, i.e., Z = {z 1 , z 2 , ⋯ , z 5 }. Suppose that the decision-maker e k provides his/her confirmed preference relations z 3 ≻z 1 , z 2 ≻z 4 , and z 3 ≻z 4 , i.e., Ω k = {(3, 1), (2,4), (3,4)}. In this case, there are only three paired comparison judgments in Ω k .…”
Section: Mcgdm Problem Under Pf Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) intends to prioritize a set of candidate alternatives based on a set of evaluative criteria regarding subjective preference and judgments of multiple decision-makers. The linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP) initiated by Srinivasan and Shocker [1] provides an efficient decision-making tool to address MCGDM problems with preference information over alternatives and unknown weights of criteria [2][3][4]. When decision-makers provide preference relations between pairs of alternatives in the MCGDM process, the LINMAP methods can be effectively applied to resolve the objective weights of criteria and specify the best compromise choice by ranking alternatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criteria such as pollution production [16,17], recycling utilization level of waste material [18], level of clean energy utilization [19], noise level [20], and level of environmental protection input [21] were considered by researchers. On the other hand, individual and hybrid methods were proposed for determining supplier selection in the literature [22]. A grey analytical network process (ANP)-based model to determine green supplier development programs to develop the performance of suppliers was introduced by [23].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Used an approach technically applied to assign variable range of criteria for supplier selection in the oil refinery. Quan et al, 2018 MCDM, MULTIMOORA, and LINMAP.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%