2021
DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2021256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid deep learning model for breast cancer diagnosis based on transfer learning and pulse-coupled neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Primary liver cancer usually develops from cirrhotic regenerative nodules (RN) to dysplastic nodules (DN) and eventually progresses to early HCC [ 1 ]. The phenotype of RN is normal in nature and is generally considered to be benign, whereas DN has some features similar to well-differentiated HCC, such as disorganized arteries, clonal-like features, and varying degrees of cellular atypia [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary liver cancer usually develops from cirrhotic regenerative nodules (RN) to dysplastic nodules (DN) and eventually progresses to early HCC [ 1 ]. The phenotype of RN is normal in nature and is generally considered to be benign, whereas DN has some features similar to well-differentiated HCC, such as disorganized arteries, clonal-like features, and varying degrees of cellular atypia [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further demonstrate the superiority of the proposed model, comparison results with existing algorithms on MIAS dataset are given in Table 12 . The literature ( 32 ) compared the classification results achieved by using different classifiers and preprocessing method of dataset splitting; the literature ( 33 ) proposed a fuzzy multilayer classifier (FMSVM) model; the literature ( 34 ) proposed a CNN-based computer detection system, which contains 8 convolutional layers, 4 maximum pooling layers and 2 fully connected layers; literature ( 35 ) built a hybrid model based on pulse-coupled neural network (PCNN) and CNN; literature ( 36 ) proposed a RANSAC model based on image processing for pectoral muscle detection method and used U-Net architecture to train the model; literature ( 37 ) proposed Morph-SPCNN model to solve the limitations of over-segmentation of mammographic images by employing SVM incorporating Gaussian, linear and polynomial kernels as classifiers; literature ( 38 ) proposed a texture based associative classifier (TBAC) for automatic breast cancer classification system; literature ( 39 ) used halarick’s texture feature extraction algorithm to obtain GLCM from mammographic images, and proposed a three-class classification of mammographic images based on the watershed algorithm combined with the K-NN classifier. By observing the experimental results in Table 12 , it is easy to find that the recognition results of the proposed algorithm (98.79%) is better than the existing algorithms mentioned above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed hybrid model was tested on a previously unreported MIAS dataset and showed an accuracy of 98.7%. In the Results section, further assessment measures can be found [ 25 ]. There are a variety of digital pathology image-evaluation techniques for breast cancer, including rule-based and machine-learning approaches [ 26 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%