2016
DOI: 10.1080/23249935.2016.1193567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid choice model with a nonlinear utility function and bounded distribution for latent variables: application to purchase intention decisions of electric cars

Abstract: The hybrid choice model (HCM) provides a powerful framework to account for heterogeneity across decision-makers in terms of different underlying latent attitudes. Typically, effects of the latent attitudes have been represented assuming linear utility functions. In contributing to the further elaboration of HCMs, this study suggests an extended HCM framework allowing for nonlinear utility functions of choice alternatives including not only observed but also latent variables. Box-Cox transformations are used to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alongside numerous empirical applications, further refinements of the model framework have taken place, looking at the specification of the measurement model (Daly et al, 2012), how and where to incorporate the latent variables into the choice model (Bahamonde-Birke et al, 2017) and testing for non-linearity and distributional assumptions (Kim et al, 2016). Substantial efforts have also gone into improved estimation techniques for the model and proper identification (Bhat & Dubey, 2014;Daziano, 2015;Raveau et al, 2012;Vij & Walker, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alongside numerous empirical applications, further refinements of the model framework have taken place, looking at the specification of the measurement model (Daly et al, 2012), how and where to incorporate the latent variables into the choice model (Bahamonde-Birke et al, 2017) and testing for non-linearity and distributional assumptions (Kim et al, 2016). Substantial efforts have also gone into improved estimation techniques for the model and proper identification (Bhat & Dubey, 2014;Daziano, 2015;Raveau et al, 2012;Vij & Walker, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physician's valuation of profit, patient health benefit, and patient consumption opportunity is captured by the preference parameters β π , β B and β C , respectively. The functional form of utility functions has been discussed in other economic applications (Keane & Moffitt, 1998;Kim et al, 2016;Koppelman, 1981;Van Soest, 1995), but less attention has been paid to the specifications of utility in the discrete choice literature within the health domain. In health economic applications, the most commonly assumed utility specification is linear additive in all choice attributes as in specification (3).…”
Section: A Model Of Discrete Treatment Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alongside numerous applications of SEM, HCM has been employed to account for a variety of attitudes in research on key decisions in the public transport context, such as mode choice (Atasoy et al 2013;Hess et al 2018;Kamargianni et al 2014;Roberts et al 2018;Song et al 2018;Tran et al 2020) and departure time choice (Thorhauge et al 2016). Additionally, substantial effort has been devoted to further refinement of the HCM framework in studies exploring the proper way to accommodate latent variables in choice models (Bahamonde-Birke et al 2017), testing non-linearity and distributional assumptions (Kim et al 2016), and seeking to improve estimation techniques (Bhat and Dubey 2014;Daziano 2015;Raveau et al 2012). To reveal the roles of SQ, OI, EA and SC in our research context, a detailed factor analysis is conducted in the data section to seek rational structures for these four attitudinal variables, as well as an HCM-based analytical framework for interpreting commuters' behavioural responses to metro TDM strategies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%