1991
DOI: 10.1109/26.81734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid ARQ scheme with adaptive forward error correction for satellite communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wireless channels introduce different requirements where BERs are higher while the computational and energy resources are limited. The use of FEC in such conditions were studies in [3] [4]. FEC is computationally expensive and has additional energy requirements, but the costly use of FEC is unnecessary under good channel conditions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Wireless channels introduce different requirements where BERs are higher while the computational and energy resources are limited. The use of FEC in such conditions were studies in [3] [4]. FEC is computationally expensive and has additional energy requirements, but the costly use of FEC is unnecessary under good channel conditions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The throughput achievable with a hybrid ARQ protocol can be maximized by dynamic adaptation of the channel coding parameters. In many adaptive ARQ-based protocols [18][19][20], the code-rate is selected in response to the actual channel state, which can be estimated by counting the number of erroneous frames; but an accurate estimation of channel state requires the analysis of many frames, so this is slow. A somewhat different adaptive hybrid ARQ model, due to Yang and Hossain [21], is based on the assumption that the channel state (in terms of symbol error rate) can be estimated on a frame-by-frame basis from the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) fed back by the receiver.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cost-effective and low complexity solution for adaptive coding is non-systematic RS coding, where only the number of information symbols fed to the encoder may vary to provide different error corrections. This approach allows the utilization of a single encoder-decoder pair [25]. Each codeword includes n c ¼ 4 bytes (32 bits) for CRC detection.…”
Section: Estimation Of Packet Losses Due To Propagation Impairments 69mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a practical, cost-effective solution for AFEC schemes, where changes between pairs of encoders-decoders are not desirable. This method is described as non-systematic RS coding [25].…”
Section: Packet-error Statistics Incorporating Block Fecmentioning
confidence: 99%