2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.11.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid approach using two-level DEA for financial failure prediction and integrated SE-DEA and GCA for indicators selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second root is rejected because the transition coefficient cannot be negative, and the first root represents the limit value of the product of the coefficients K 1 K 2 at which the system will still be stable: K lim =K 1 K 2 =1.837×10 6 . Thus, the inequality 1.837×10 6 >K 1 K 2 >0 indicates the condition of the system stability relative to the product K 1 K 2 .…”
Section: Discussion Of the Enterprise Functioning Stability Results Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second root is rejected because the transition coefficient cannot be negative, and the first root represents the limit value of the product of the coefficients K 1 K 2 at which the system will still be stable: K lim =K 1 K 2 =1.837×10 6 . Thus, the inequality 1.837×10 6 >K 1 K 2 >0 indicates the condition of the system stability relative to the product K 1 K 2 .…”
Section: Discussion Of the Enterprise Functioning Stability Results Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the issues related to the construction of the model complex were highlighted fragmentarily. In a number of sources, applied models of wind power plants stability assessment are considered, which allow forming a system of stability diagnostic indicators on the basis of signs complete and incomplete reduction methods [3,4], carrying out classification of IES stability states on the basis of cluster analysis methods [3], DEA methods [5,6], identifying the class of IES stability on the basis of classification trees [3], models of multiple choice [4], discriminant analysis [5]. It should be noted that along with the undoubted advantages, the above works do not adequately cover the issues of the comparative analysis of application effectiveness of various simulation methods.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation results of Banker and Natarajan [33] prove that DEA is more effective than the parameter estimation method. The essence of DEA is using a mathematical programming model to estimate best-practice frontiers without a priori underlying functional form assumption through computing multi-input/multi-output values [34]. DEA was first proposed by Charnes et al [35] as a statistical analysis method for efficiency evaluation under the hypothesis of "relative effectiveness", and the CCR model is suitable for efficiency comparison under the constant return scale (CRS).…”
Section: Data Envelopment Analysis (Dea)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The super efficiency value is no longer limited to the range from 0 to 1, and a value greater than or equal to 1 is obtained. In this way, we can sort and select the best ones from these decision-making units and then make a scientific evaluation [35,36]. The model is listed below:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%