Proceedings. National Power Engineering Conference, 2003. PECon 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/pecon.2003.1437442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid approach for security evaluation and preventive control of power systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to notice that the ML techniques should only use the static variables available from ACOPF. It would not be practical if the algorithm required pre-fault dynamic (state variables) or post-fault variables as inputs since they impose huge pre-processing calculations [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to notice that the ML techniques should only use the static variables available from ACOPF. It would not be practical if the algorithm required pre-fault dynamic (state variables) or post-fault variables as inputs since they impose huge pre-processing calculations [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secure and insecure regions under the contingency, and , can be represented by the unions of corresponding patterns: (17) where and denote the th secure and th insecure patterns, respectively.…”
Section: Pattern-based Dynamic Secure/insecure Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [16], load shedding strategies are inferred from inverse reading of the DT. In [17], a hybrid method using NN and DT is designed for preventive generation rescheduling. In [18], the dynamic secure boundaries are approximated by a linear combination of DT rules, which are then applied for generation rescheduling and load shedding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained thresholds not only build a fast prediction model, but also formulate the assessment plans and in turn infer the preventive control rules. This superiority makes DTs very popular for designing static, dynamic security and also transient stability of power systems [9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%