1999
DOI: 10.1006/geno.1998.5513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Human Mitochondrial DNA Standard Reference Material for Quality Control in Forensic Identification, Medical Diagnosis, and Mutation Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard errors were estimated from 1000 (H) 133 100 50 100 50 100 31 100 165 100 50 100 50 100 1 this study 2 data from Loogväli et al (2004) Note -The fraction of unclassified hg H haplotypes involving haplogroups H8, H9, H10, H12, H13, H14 and H15 (Achilli et al 2004;Loogväli et al 2004), based on the data taken from literature (32 from 458 Achilli et al 2004;Coble et al 2004;Finnilä et al 2001;Herrnstadt et al 2002;Howell et al 2003;Ingman et al 2000;Levin et al 1999;Maca-Meyer et al 2001;Mishmar et al 2003;Palanichamy et al 2004;Reid et al 1994;Rieder et al 1998) makes up only 5-10% of hg H, thus ca. 9 out of 133 in our sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard errors were estimated from 1000 (H) 133 100 50 100 50 100 31 100 165 100 50 100 50 100 1 this study 2 data from Loogväli et al (2004) Note -The fraction of unclassified hg H haplotypes involving haplogroups H8, H9, H10, H12, H13, H14 and H15 (Achilli et al 2004;Loogväli et al 2004), based on the data taken from literature (32 from 458 Achilli et al 2004;Coble et al 2004;Finnilä et al 2001;Herrnstadt et al 2002;Howell et al 2003;Ingman et al 2000;Levin et al 1999;Maca-Meyer et al 2001;Mishmar et al 2003;Palanichamy et al 2004;Reid et al 1994;Rieder et al 1998) makes up only 5-10% of hg H, thus ca. 9 out of 133 in our sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Briefly, amplifications were performed in 50 ml reactions comprising of approximately 50 ng DNA, 0.1 mM dNTPs (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA), 1 Â PCR Gold buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.5 mM each primer, 2.5 U AmpliTaq Gold polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and nuclease-free H 2 O (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Primer sequences were as follows: 5 0 CACCCTATTAACCACTCACG3 0 sense and 5 0 TGAGATTA GTAGTATGGGAG3 0 antisense for D loop (#15-484), 7 5 0 AACATACCCATGGCCAACCT3 0 sense and 5 0 GGCAGGA GTAATCAGAGGTG3 0 antisense for NDI (#3304-3836), 8 5 0 TATCACCTTTCATGATACGC3 0 sense and 5 0 GACGAT GGGCATGAAACTG3 0 antisense for COXII (#7645-8215), 5 0 CTGTTCGCTTCATTCATTGCC3 0 sense and 5 0 GTGGCGCT TCCAATTAGGTG3 0 antisense for ATPase 6 (#8539-9059), gel at 100 V for 45 min to confim product purity and correct size. The remaining portion of the PCR product was column purified using a Qiaquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA).…”
Section: Polymerase Chain Reaction and Dna Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nucleotide positions 16 024 ± 16 324 and 63 ± 322 located in the D-Loop are termed ®rst hypervariable region (HV1) and second hypervariable region (HV2), respectively (Miller et al, 1996). The sequence analysis of these two regions is used not only in forensic analyses, but also in medical diagnosis (Levin et al, 1999). Fliss et al (2000) suggested that the constitutive hypervariable areas such as the mtDNA D-Loop are hot spots for somatic mutations in malignant tumors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%