2011
DOI: 10.1186/1747-1028-6-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A human cancer-predisposing polymorphism in Cdc25A is embryonic lethal in the mouse and promotes ASK-1 mediated apoptosis

Abstract: BackgroundFailure to regulate the levels of Cdc25A phosphatase during the cell cycle or during a checkpoint response causes bypass of DNA damage and replication checkpoints resulting in genomic instability and cancer. During G1 and S and in cellular response to DNA damage, Cdc25A is targeted for degradation through the Skp1-cullin-β-TrCP (SCFβ-TrCP) complex. This complex binds to the Cdc25A DSG motif which contains serine residues at positions 82 and 88. Phosphorylation of one or both residues is necessary for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, reduction in the level of Cdc25A was less severe when cells were transfected with ARD1 than when they were not ( Supplementary Figure S6A , lane 2 vs. 4). We next transfected cells with a Cdc25A-S82A mutant that is refractory to DNA damage-mediated degradation ( Supplementary Figure S6B , see lanes 5 and 6, used as control) [ 39 , 44 ], to ask whether depletion of ARD1, hence less acetylation, will allow some mutant Cdc25A degradation after etoposide administration. Surprisingly, ARD1A/B depletion led to reduced levels of wild-type and mutant Cdc25A-S82A ( Supplementary Figure S6B , compare lane 1 vs. 3, and 5 vs. 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reduction in the level of Cdc25A was less severe when cells were transfected with ARD1 than when they were not ( Supplementary Figure S6A , lane 2 vs. 4). We next transfected cells with a Cdc25A-S82A mutant that is refractory to DNA damage-mediated degradation ( Supplementary Figure S6B , see lanes 5 and 6, used as control) [ 39 , 44 ], to ask whether depletion of ARD1, hence less acetylation, will allow some mutant Cdc25A degradation after etoposide administration. Surprisingly, ARD1A/B depletion led to reduced levels of wild-type and mutant Cdc25A-S82A ( Supplementary Figure S6B , compare lane 1 vs. 3, and 5 vs. 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 4 )). Consistently, in vivo studies showed that a human cancer-predisposing polymorphism, Cdc25A S88F, causes mouse embryonic lethality and induces apoptosis due to being incapable of binding to and inhibiting ASK1 [97], implying that the DSG motif might be critical for interaction between Cdc25A and ASK1. Furthermore, ectopic expression of Cdc25A was found to result in suppressing serum starvation-induced apoptosis by activating AKT [98].…”
Section: The Role Of Cdc25a In Apoptosismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…RPE-1- TP53 wt and RPE-1- TP53 mut cell lines were engineered to express Cdc25A or Cyclin E1 in a doxycycline-dependent manner. To this end, human CDC25A was PCR amplified from FLAG-CDC25A-WT, which was a gift from Peter Stambrook 55 , using the following oligos: forward: 5′-CGCGGCCGCCATGGAACTGGGCCCGGAGCCC-3′, reverse: 5′-GATGAATTCTCACAGCTTCTTCAGACG-3′. Human CCNE1 was PCR amplified from Rc-CycE, which was a gift from Bob Weinberg (Plasmid #8963, Addgene) 56 , using the following oligos: forward: 5′-CGCGGCCGCCATGAAGGAGGACGGCGGCGCG-3′, reverse: 5′-GATGAATTCTCACGCCATTTCCGGCCC-3′.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%