2010
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-s1-s25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hub-attachment based method to detect functional modules from confidence-scored protein interactions and expression profiles

Abstract: BackgroundMany research results show that the biological systems are composed of functional modules. Members in the same module usually have common functions. This is useful information to understand how biological systems work. Therefore, detecting functional modules is an important research topic in the post-genome era. One of functional module detecting methods is to find dense regions in Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) networks. Most of current methods neglect confidence-scores of interactions, and pay l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a parameter-free clustering method (Chin et al, 2010), HUNTER generates a module seed from a vertex and, then, the seed grows gradually by adding vertices that are strongly connected to it. The method further merges any two grown modules with common vertices above a threshold iteratively, and finally determines the output clusters.…”
Section: Clustering Methods In Spotlightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a parameter-free clustering method (Chin et al, 2010), HUNTER generates a module seed from a vertex and, then, the seed grows gradually by adding vertices that are strongly connected to it. The method further merges any two grown modules with common vertices above a threshold iteratively, and finally determines the output clusters.…”
Section: Clustering Methods In Spotlightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various community structure detection (or graph clustering) methods applied to the PPI network to detect protein complexes and functional modules include random walk based methods (Enright et al, 2002;Pons and Latapy, 2005;van Dongen, 2000), edge betweenness-based methods (Dunn et al, 2005;Girvan and Newman, 2002;Luo et al, 2007), clique percolation methods (Adamcsek et al, 2006;Zhang et al, 2006), and core-attachment based methods (Chin et al, 2010;Leung et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2009). While relying on widely divergent approaches, these methods have their own unique strengths and limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MRF methods were later extended by combining PPI data, with gene expression data, protein motif information, mutant phenotype data, and protein localization data to specify which proteins might be active in a given biological process [36,37]. Other global approaches integrated PPI network with more heterogeneous data sources (such as large-scale two-hybrid screens and multiple microarray analyses) [10,38]. Our algorithm ClusFCM [39] assigned biological homology scores to interacting proteins and performed agglomerative clustering on the weighted network to cluster the proteins by known functions and cellular location; functions then were assigned to proteins by a Fuzzy Cognitive Map.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers applied this concept to design detecting protein complex, such as COACH [8], Hunter [9], and Core [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%