2017
DOI: 10.21201/2017.9750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ‘How To’ Guide To Measuring Women's Empowerment: Sharing experience from Oxfam’s impact evaluations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential for shell-based handicraft to empower women was identified through the high percentage of female participants and the capacity for women to engage in production and sales from home (Lombardini et al 2017). This aspect of shell-based handicraft allows women to obtain control over productive resources within the household and gain access to income without compromising availability for family responsibilities at home (UN Women 2014; Lombardini et al 2017). A well-recognised benefit of livelihood sectors providing income-generating opportunities to women is that the income generated by women is typically spent on family and home development, in comparison to the more frivolous expenditures associated with male management of income (Chaaban and Cunningham 2011; UN Women 2014; Barclay et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential for shell-based handicraft to empower women was identified through the high percentage of female participants and the capacity for women to engage in production and sales from home (Lombardini et al 2017). This aspect of shell-based handicraft allows women to obtain control over productive resources within the household and gain access to income without compromising availability for family responsibilities at home (UN Women 2014; Lombardini et al 2017). A well-recognised benefit of livelihood sectors providing income-generating opportunities to women is that the income generated by women is typically spent on family and home development, in comparison to the more frivolous expenditures associated with male management of income (Chaaban and Cunningham 2011; UN Women 2014; Barclay et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework was a priori deemed appropriate for a systematic scoping review on women’s empowerment, because it is multifactorial and holistic [ 33 ]. Very briefly, the Gender at Work framework contends that to be sustainable, change must occur at the individual, household, community and national levels simultaneously [ 34 ]. It is based on two dimensions: individual vs. systemic and formal vs. informal, and divided in four quadrants (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting ratiothe proportion of indicators in which each citizen scored above the thresholdis defined as the index for each sense of power. This approach is similar to the multidimensional measurement of women's empowerment (Lombardini et al, 2017) and resilience capacities, developed in Oxfam's Effectiveness Reviews, 33 and inspired by the Alkire-Foster method used by the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative. 34…”
Section: Matching Intervention Households To Comparison Householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perception of others' political role and public behaviours contribute to one's inner sense of power. For women in particular, Lombardini et al (2017) highlight that '"Power within" is described by indicators referring to how a woman perceives herself and other women in the society'.…”
Section: Gender Role About Speaking Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation