2014
DOI: 10.1350/jcla.2014.78.1.894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Householder's Right to Kill or Injure an Intruder under the Crime and Courts Act 2013: An Australian Comparison

Abstract: Section 43 of the Crime and Courts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…49 Under s. 76 of the 2008 Act, as amended, disproportionate force in a householder case will now be reasonable in the circumstances as the householder believes them to be and will only be unreasonable if grossly disproportionate. 52 There is, then, obviously no surprise that practitioners were in the same boat as their academic counterparts. This is demonstrated by the stark contrast in opinions expressed by the editors of Archbold and Blackstone's, as Sir Brian Leveson noted in his judgment.…”
Section: Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Under s. 76 of the 2008 Act, as amended, disproportionate force in a householder case will now be reasonable in the circumstances as the householder believes them to be and will only be unreasonable if grossly disproportionate. 52 There is, then, obviously no surprise that practitioners were in the same boat as their academic counterparts. This is demonstrated by the stark contrast in opinions expressed by the editors of Archbold and Blackstone's, as Sir Brian Leveson noted in his judgment.…”
Section: Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, this period of time includes when the well‐documented Petit family home invasion and murders captured the nation's attention (McDowell‐Smith ) and perhaps affected newspaper editors’ choices to publish related news stories. Third, media campaigns may have played an intermediary role in the development of home invasion legislation in other countries like New Zealand and Australia by constructing widespread fear about these crimes (Dobinson and Elliot ; Matthews ). All of these factors are indicative of a potential moral panic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%