2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Household-Based Human Development Index

Abstract: One of the most serious weaknesses of the human development index (HDI) is that it does not take into account the distribution of human development within a country. All attempts to capture inequality in the HDI have used aggregate information and there exists no HDI at the household level. We provide a method for proxying the HDI at the household level. This allows the immediate analysis of human development by population subgroups and/or socioeconomic characteristics as well as analysis of inequality in huma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
52
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The HDI was initially developed to underline that people and their capabilities should be the ultimate criteria for evaluating the development level of a country along with economic growth (UNDP, 2013a). Despite a number of authors discuss some drawbacks of the HDI (Trabold-Nübler, 1991;Hicks, 1997;Ivanova, Arcelus, & Srinivasan, 1999;Chowdhury & Squire, 2006;Klugman, Rodríguez, & Choi, 2011), and even propose some modified indices (Paul, 1996;Sharma, 1997;Noorbakhsh, 1998;Chakravarty, 2003;Mazumdar, 2003;Grimm, et al, 2008;Harttgen & Klasen, 2012;Herrero, Martínez, & Villar, 2012;Bilbao-Ubillos, 2013;Blancard & Hoarau, 2013); one of the most significant superiorities of the HDI is regarded as its usefulness that is able to represent both social and economic development through a single value between 0 and 1 (UNDP, 2013b).…”
Section: Human Development and The Hdimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HDI was initially developed to underline that people and their capabilities should be the ultimate criteria for evaluating the development level of a country along with economic growth (UNDP, 2013a). Despite a number of authors discuss some drawbacks of the HDI (Trabold-Nübler, 1991;Hicks, 1997;Ivanova, Arcelus, & Srinivasan, 1999;Chowdhury & Squire, 2006;Klugman, Rodríguez, & Choi, 2011), and even propose some modified indices (Paul, 1996;Sharma, 1997;Noorbakhsh, 1998;Chakravarty, 2003;Mazumdar, 2003;Grimm, et al, 2008;Harttgen & Klasen, 2012;Herrero, Martínez, & Villar, 2012;Bilbao-Ubillos, 2013;Blancard & Hoarau, 2013); one of the most significant superiorities of the HDI is regarded as its usefulness that is able to represent both social and economic development through a single value between 0 and 1 (UNDP, 2013b).…”
Section: Human Development and The Hdimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, HDI does not describe human development as a whole, yet it is a better measurement than income. One of the most serious disadvantages of human development index (HDI) is that it does not consider the distribution of human development within a country (Harttgen, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control for the context in which the individual lives we use the Human Development Index 17 See, Harttgen and Klasen (2012) as well as Klasen and Schüler (2011).…”
Section: Measuring the Economic And Institutional Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%