2011
DOI: 10.12989/sem.2011.38.4.503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A homogenization approach for uncertainty quantification of deflection in reinforced concrete beams considering microstructural variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to compare the simulated mineral (pore, quartz, the others) volume fraction with the real volume fraction from XRD or MIP, a concrete cube of mm was simulated. The size of mm was chosen because the minimum size of a REV of concrete at a mesoscale should be at least 2.5 times bigger than the maximum aggregate size (16 mm in this paper) [ 48 , 49 ]. The cube is composed of mortar and irregular aggregate with a particle size from 4 mm to 16 mm.…”
Section: Experimental Corroboration Of the Simulated 3d Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the simulated mineral (pore, quartz, the others) volume fraction with the real volume fraction from XRD or MIP, a concrete cube of mm was simulated. The size of mm was chosen because the minimum size of a REV of concrete at a mesoscale should be at least 2.5 times bigger than the maximum aggregate size (16 mm in this paper) [ 48 , 49 ]. The cube is composed of mortar and irregular aggregate with a particle size from 4 mm to 16 mm.…”
Section: Experimental Corroboration Of the Simulated 3d Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generation the FE model includes image processing as shown in Fig. 1 and is further discussed elsewhere [8].…”
Section: Finite Element Model Of Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mechanisms are essential to accurately consider the mixed contribution of Mode I and Mode II fractures such that realistic simulation of initiation and propagation of ITZ debonding can be achieved. More details on contact and cracking models used here are discussed elsewhere [8].…”
Section: Finite Element Model Of Concretementioning
confidence: 99%