1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1978.tb01267.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Home Obstetric Service With Expert Consultation and Back‐Up

Abstract: The medical literature comparing home and hospital obstetric outcomes is reviewed. A home obstetric service with hospital and obstetrician back-up is described, including screening, care during pregnancy and delivety and management of complications. Of 495 women who were accepted for home delivery, 77 miscarried or moved, 49 changed to hospital delivery, 19 had premature labor, and 61 were transferred to the hospital during labor. Maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity are described. In this well-selec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the homebirth movement began in the 1970s, there have been several descriptive studies of home birth. Many of these studies show equal or superior outcomes for planned home births attended by physicians, direct entry, or nurse‐midwives, compared with hospital populations of similar risk (19–22), or compared with overall perinatal morbidity and mortality rates (23, 24). Although they did not provide comparable control groups, these studies have made an important contribution in separating myth from reality concerning home birth, and have demonstrated good outcomes for low‐risk women.…”
Section: Establishing the Safety Of Home Birthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the homebirth movement began in the 1970s, there have been several descriptive studies of home birth. Many of these studies show equal or superior outcomes for planned home births attended by physicians, direct entry, or nurse‐midwives, compared with hospital populations of similar risk (19–22), or compared with overall perinatal morbidity and mortality rates (23, 24). Although they did not provide comparable control groups, these studies have made an important contribution in separating myth from reality concerning home birth, and have demonstrated good outcomes for low‐risk women.…”
Section: Establishing the Safety Of Home Birthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although home birth advocates have claimed superior outcomes without qualifying the highly selective nature of the home birth population, anti‐home birth commentators have made home birth appear dangerous by not distinguishing unplanned, precipitous, premature, and unattended home births from planned, attended, and prenatally screened home births. Several studies, including one in North Carolina, one in Kentucky, and two in California, have demonstrated significant differences between planned and unplanned home birth outcomes (20–22, 24).…”
Section: Establishing the Safety Of Home Birthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have reported positive outcomes for home birth (1–26), including births attended by apprentice‐trained midwives 1 and certified nurse‐rnidwives in the United States and births attended by direct‐entry midwives in Canada and the Netherlands. However, there is an ongoing debate regarding whether it is safe for any provider to attend breech deliveries, twin deliveries, and post‐dates pregnancies at home.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%