2018
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A home‐based mentored vegetable gardening intervention demonstrates feasibility and improvements in physical activity and performance among breast cancer survivors

Abstract: The results of the current study suggest that a mentored, home-based vegetable gardening intervention is feasible and offers an integrative and durable approach with which to improve health behaviors and outcomes among BCS. Harvest for Health led to the establishment of a group of trained Master Gardeners and gave rise to local and global community-based programs. Larger studies are needed to confirm the results presented herein and to define applicability across broader populations of survivors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
94
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Urban living may be less conducive to home gardening due to lack of space, costs associated with raised beds or concerns about prior uses of the land and possible soil contamination (23) . Consistent with research on community gardens and fruit and vegetable consumption (13,(24)(25)(26)(27) , we found positive associations between home gardening and fruit and vegetable intake (4,5) . We also found that home gardens were associated with lower BMI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Urban living may be less conducive to home gardening due to lack of space, costs associated with raised beds or concerns about prior uses of the land and possible soil contamination (23) . Consistent with research on community gardens and fruit and vegetable consumption (13,(24)(25)(26)(27) , we found positive associations between home gardening and fruit and vegetable intake (4,5) . We also found that home gardens were associated with lower BMI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Research on gardening and BMI is rare; Zick et al (28) found that community gardeners in Salt Lake City had lower BMI than their siblings and neighbours. Bail et al (4) examined weight and BMI among cancer survivors in a home gardening intervention but found no impact on either. Consistent with other studies, we saw a positive association between gardening and higher social capital (7) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-equivalent control group and single group pretest, post-test were the most frequently used quasi-experimental study designs ( 20% ). There were 8 randomised controlled trials ( 9% ) 28 31 35 43 56 59 65 96 and 13 ( 16% ) systematic reviews. 26 32 42 44 60 64 75 83 86 90 94 97 98 All, barring one 60 of the systematic reviews reported heterogeneous complex interventions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several positive outcomes were reported including social: involving skills, behaviours and networks; general mental well-being, such as stress reduction, 35 94 reduced anxiety and depression. 28 60 65 As with the mental health logic model, the graphic illustration enables visual representation of the overlap between the mental, physical, social and emotional outcomes. Thus, papers that reported impact on general well-being also included outcome measures that indicated increased physical activity resulting in reduced body mass index 43 and healthier blood glucose levels, 43 and general well-being that benefited community growth, 66 social interaction 62 68 and quality of life.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bail et al . [28] conducted a 12-month randomized controlled trial of a home-based mentored vegetable gardening intervention among 82 breast cancer survivors. Compared with the controls, intervention participants reported significantly greater improvements in moderate physical activity and demonstrated improvements in the two-minute step test and arm curl (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%