2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Holistic Comparative Analysis of Different Storage Systems using Levelized Cost of Storage and Life Cycle Indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table A.8 we summarize the yearly power production LCOE (the levelized cost of electricity produced from each power plant without considering any future load curtailment or other losses) and average selling price for each generation technology and LCOS (levelized cost of storage; cf. Jülch et al, 2015) and the average selling price of each storage technology for weather-year 2006. For all power production technologies, the average market selling price is higher than the LCOE, the difference being very low for the VRE resources (offshore wind ~€0.10/ ℎ , onshore wind ~€0.15/ ℎ and solar PV ~€0.40/ ℎ ) while for the other technologies this difference is much greater, especially for biogas (€44.40/ ℎ ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table A.8 we summarize the yearly power production LCOE (the levelized cost of electricity produced from each power plant without considering any future load curtailment or other losses) and average selling price for each generation technology and LCOS (levelized cost of storage; cf. Jülch et al, 2015) and the average selling price of each storage technology for weather-year 2006. For all power production technologies, the average market selling price is higher than the LCOE, the difference being very low for the VRE resources (offshore wind ~€0.10/ ℎ , onshore wind ~€0.15/ ℎ and solar PV ~€0.40/ ℎ ) while for the other technologies this difference is much greater, especially for biogas (€44.40/ ℎ ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LCOE is not directly applicable in assessing storage cost since energy storage does not generate its energy. Adapting the basic idea behind LCOE, Jülch et al [29,39] defined Levelized Cost of Storage (LCOS) as the sum of all the annual expenses (such as operational cost and charging cost) and capital cost divided by the sum of delivered energy over the lifetime of the storage. The approach is relatively similar to LCOE, but instead of generating the energy, LCOS purchases electricity and the delivered energy incorporates the cycle lost (charge and discharge).…”
Section: Economic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ESS LCOE, also called Levelized Cost of Storage (LCOS), represents the cost of the electricity delivered by an ESS according to its lifetime estimation. The criteria can be evaluate by including different parameters as in [18], [36], where the authors propose to include in the LCOE the cost of the energy needed to charge the ESS. Moreover, in [38]the authors show that the LCOE clearly depends on the ESS applications.…”
Section: B Lcoementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time horizon chosen for this study is 25 years, considering that corresponds to an average value of SC calendar lifetime, according to data given in [5], [13], [20]. The discount rate can vary from 3.5% to 8% regarding the values proposed in the literature, we selected the worst value of 3.5% as proposed by [18].…”
Section: B Lcoementioning
confidence: 99%