2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2010
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2010.5509888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A HMM-based approach to learning probability models of programming strategies for industrial robots

Abstract: The integration of industrial robot systems into the manufacturing environments of small and medium sized enterprises is a key requirement to guarantee competitiveness and productivity. Due to the still complex and time-consuming procedure of robot path definition, novel programming strategies are needed, converting the robotic system into a flexible coworker that actively supports its operator. In this paper, a learning-from-demonstration strategy based on Hidden Markov Models is presented, which permits the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lead-through programming -standard used in industrial settings, together with OLP -[96]- [98]: usability assessment -[100]- [103]: improved with intuitive input devices (comparative overview in [13]) Off-line programming -standard used in industrial settings -refinements with lead-through programming still necessary - [13], [104]: review of the method and its variants -[106]- [109]: approaches and issues related to robot calibration Walk-through programming -[6], [12], [110]- [120], [124], [125], [127], [128]: force/torque sensing -- [6], [12], [113]- [117], [124], [125]: admittance/impedance control schemes -- [118], [119], [127], [128]: variable admittance/impedance control -- [120]: force control - [110], [124], [125]: introduction of a virtual tool - [35], [130], [131]: techniques alternative to force/torque sensing to detect intentional interaction -[121]- [123]: preliminary industrial applications Programming by demonstration - [8], [139]: overview and classification - [133], [134]: symbolic encoding - [135], [136]: trajectory encoding - [145]: preliminary industrial applications…”
Section: Robot Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Lead-through programming -standard used in industrial settings, together with OLP -[96]- [98]: usability assessment -[100]- [103]: improved with intuitive input devices (comparative overview in [13]) Off-line programming -standard used in industrial settings -refinements with lead-through programming still necessary - [13], [104]: review of the method and its variants -[106]- [109]: approaches and issues related to robot calibration Walk-through programming -[6], [12], [110]- [120], [124], [125], [127], [128]: force/torque sensing -- [6], [12], [113]- [117], [124], [125]: admittance/impedance control schemes -- [118], [119], [127], [128]: variable admittance/impedance control -- [120]: force control - [110], [124], [125]: introduction of a virtual tool - [35], [130], [131]: techniques alternative to force/torque sensing to detect intentional interaction -[121]- [123]: preliminary industrial applications Programming by demonstration - [8], [139]: overview and classification - [133], [134]: symbolic encoding - [135], [136]: trajectory encoding - [145]: preliminary industrial applications…”
Section: Robot Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of works related to PbD consist in theoretical and experimental approaches, and appear far to be ready for everyday implementation in industrial practice [140,141,142,143,144]. In [145] an approach for PbD in industrial welding applications is presented. However, the definition of robot paths is performed by walk-through programming, thus the robot can only imitate demonstrated trajectories.…”
Section: Programming By Demonstrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It allows the operator to play the role of an instructor that physically moves the robot through the desired positions within its workspace. Examples of applications that used force guidance for programming are the definition of welding trajectories (Hollmann et al , 2010), the assembly of structures in civil construction (Lee et al , 2007) and the assembly of parts performed in collaboration between a robot and a human (Schraft et al , 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%