2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A History of the Molecular Initiating Event

Abstract: The adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework provides an alternative to traditional in vivo experiments for the risk assessment of chemicals. AOPs consist of a number of key events (KEs) linked by key event relationships across a range of biological organization backed by scientific evidence. The first KE in the pathway is the molecular initiating event (MIE)-the initial chemical trigger that starts an AOP. Over the past 3 years the AOP conceptual framework has gained a large amount of momentum in toxicology as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information from the Molecular Initiating Event (MIE) is one of the key drivers for in silico models derived from an AOP. [25][26][27][28] Before computational modelling approaches are considered, it should be recognised that there are different types of MIEs and each may require a different modelling approach. These have been summarised in general terms in Table 1, along with examples and the types of models that can be derived from the different types of MIE.…”
Section: Models Of the Molecular Initiating Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Information from the Molecular Initiating Event (MIE) is one of the key drivers for in silico models derived from an AOP. [25][26][27][28] Before computational modelling approaches are considered, it should be recognised that there are different types of MIEs and each may require a different modelling approach. These have been summarised in general terms in Table 1, along with examples and the types of models that can be derived from the different types of MIE.…”
Section: Models Of the Molecular Initiating Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the outset it is well acknowledged that AOPs can support computational modelling. 21 In addition, the use of AOPs to support computational modelling deriving structural alerts [25][26][27][28] for toxicity prediction or as part of a grouping strategy leading to read-across, and for QSAR development, is well established. 29 Other computational approaches, beyond the ab initio risk assessment consideration, that utilise and extend the AOP framework are the development of Integrated Assessment and Testing Approaches (IATAs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the focus of the study was to examine scenarios in which these similarity values might be useful for read-across based upon pairwise comparison to one or a few chemicals, with measured endpoint data, for the purpose of toxicological data gap filling. Specific objectives were to assess the performance and reliability of different molecular fingerprints used in similarity analysis, with a view to determine when similarity computed in this fashion works well and does not work well, as well as to consider how molecular similarity can be placed into a mechanistic framework to predict toxicity taking in account molecular initiating events (MIEs) (Allen et al, 2016. It should also be made clear that the purpose of this study was not to conclusively establish an optimum method for predicting toxicity.…”
Section: Figure 1 Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An AOP consists of a series of measurable key events (KEs) linked to one another by key event relationships ( Figure 1). The first KE generally is a molecular initiating event (MIE), which captures the interaction of a chemical with a biological macromolecule, that triggers subsequent KEs which could result in an adverse outcome (AO) at the individual or population level [8,9]. Explicit in an AOP is that the KEs are causally linked to one-another, an attribute that can be formally assessed using weight-of-evidence analyses [10,11].…”
Section: Definition and Attributes Of The Aop Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%