2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2006.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A history of scanning electron microscopy developments: Towards “wet-STEM” imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
152
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
152
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The electron beam is produced by the electron gun. The path of the electron is held vertical within a vacuum chamber [77] [78].…”
Section: Morphology Characterization Of the Sensing Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron beam is produced by the electron gun. The path of the electron is held vertical within a vacuum chamber [77] [78].…”
Section: Morphology Characterization Of the Sensing Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the Wet-STEM by Bogner et al (2005Bogner et al ( , 2007 allows observing samples in the transmission mode in the ESEM chamber, and more particularly, it offers the possibility to image directly nanoparticles dispersed in a few micrometer thin water film (Bogner et al, 2008), emulsions or vesicles (Maraloiu et al, 2010), without removing the liquid surrounding the objects of interest. One must keep in mind that images with soft matter, and more generally sample sensitive to the electron beam are very hard to obtain.…”
Section: Using the Wet-stem Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, we must report the Peltier stage for temperature control in the -10 to 60°C range, hot stages for temperature control up to 1500°C, stages for mechanical tests (Figure 1). Some authors have developed their own specific stages adapted to the problem to be treated (Fielden, 2005;Bogner et al, 2007). However, the development of miniaturized stages that can be positioned in the SEM chamber without creating perturbations on the incident electron beam can be really challenging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons is fundamental to chose a fluid material enough to penetrate the furrows, but not excessively fluid as to avoid overflowing outside the interested area. Furthermore a constant pressure of about the gel applied on the skin must be applied in order to obtain replicas with reproducible thickness [Bogner et al 2007]. Perugini et al demonstrated how the association of skin replica and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) can be used for in vivo visualization of solid lipid nanoparticles on the skin surface [Perugini et al, 2011].…”
Section: Replicamentioning
confidence: 99%