1996
DOI: 10.1086/629803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A History of Continents in the past Three Billion Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
226
0
17

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 541 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
5
226
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Rogers 1996, Rogers & Santosh 2002, Zhao et al 2002, 2003, 2004, Meert 2002, Pesonen et al 2003, Hou et al 2008a, 2008b, Johansson 2009, 2014, Yakubchuck 2010, Piper 2010, Evans & Mitchell 2011, Zhang et al 2012. This supercontinent has received different names: NENA (Gower et al 1990), NUNA (Hoffman 1997), Columbia (Rogers & Santosh 2002), or Paleopangea (Piper 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rogers 1996, Rogers & Santosh 2002, Zhao et al 2002, 2003, 2004, Meert 2002, Pesonen et al 2003, Hou et al 2008a, 2008b, Johansson 2009, 2014, Yakubchuck 2010, Piper 2010, Evans & Mitchell 2011, Zhang et al 2012. This supercontinent has received different names: NENA (Gower et al 1990), NUNA (Hoffman 1997), Columbia (Rogers & Santosh 2002), or Paleopangea (Piper 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of evidence for closure of wide oceanic domains in all these regions does not support the interpretation of the central and south domains of the PANEFB as a series of amalgamated terranes [18]. Destabilisation of a pre-existing continent that formed at the end of Paleoproterozoic/Eburnean orogeny [67] provides the simplest explanation to the above findings. An ultimate period of plate-wide extension occurred in the mid/late Neoproterozoic.…”
Section: Implications For the Assembly Of Western Gondwanamentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Estas afinidades transcendem em muito o atual nível de conhecimento e somatória de dados geológicos gerais, petrológicos e geocronológicos, que de certa forma está resumido na comparação esquematizada na Tabela 1. Foi baseado em similaridades destes tipos, e desprezando algumas diferenças a considerar, que foi ousada uma designação conjunta de "Terreno Potiguar-Hoggar" para este contexto , na presuposição de que se trataria de um único megafragmento do Supercontinente Atlântica, da concepção de Rogers (1996).…”
Section: Porção Oriental (Imediatamente a Leste Dounclassified