2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-52937-4.50008-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A History Of Connexivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study offers a new approach to the issue of connexivity. Rather than using for instance possible worlds or many logical values [McCall, 2012]  as the starting basis for the definition of connexive logic  we shall assume a certain type of intensional logic: relating logic. By combing the semantic structures for relating logics with a Boolean language we obtain several different logics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study offers a new approach to the issue of connexivity. Rather than using for instance possible worlds or many logical values [McCall, 2012]  as the starting basis for the definition of connexive logic  we shall assume a certain type of intensional logic: relating logic. By combing the semantic structures for relating logics with a Boolean language we obtain several different logics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are attributed to the ancient philosopher and logician Boethius. For the history of connexive logics see [6]. It is generally agreed that connexive logics are not truth-functional, and arise from an attempt to capture some connection between the antecedent and the consequent of a conditional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A connexive extension of a weak Relevance logic can be found in [11]. Also, in [10] McCall presents such a system, adopting the 'use tracing' technique of the ND-system of Anderson and Belnap [1], not specifically associated with R → . I refer to the resulting specific logic proposed in this paper as L rc , a logic of relevance and connexivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%