1895
DOI: 10.1038/052174b0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A History of British Earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Times (1892a) also reports this event in the river Yealm as well as stating that "about the time of the earthquake there was a rapid rise in the River Fowey [an estuary in Cornwall] as a great tidal wave, but this immediately subsided" (p. 4). Davison (1924) does not believe that the waves observed in Milford Haven and those along the south coast of Devon and Cornwall are linked. Indeed, The Times (1892b) report thunderstorms in the English Channel on the 18 August that may have spawned meteorological tsunami (Montserrat et al, 2006) along the English Channel coast, as later occurred with tragic consequences at Folkestone in July 1929 (Douglas, 1929).…”
Section: Near-coastal Low-magnitude Seismic Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Times (1892a) also reports this event in the river Yealm as well as stating that "about the time of the earthquake there was a rapid rise in the River Fowey [an estuary in Cornwall] as a great tidal wave, but this immediately subsided" (p. 4). Davison (1924) does not believe that the waves observed in Milford Haven and those along the south coast of Devon and Cornwall are linked. Indeed, The Times (1892b) report thunderstorms in the English Channel on the 18 August that may have spawned meteorological tsunami (Montserrat et al, 2006) along the English Channel coast, as later occurred with tragic consequences at Folkestone in July 1929 (Douglas, 1929).…”
Section: Near-coastal Low-magnitude Seismic Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 m in southern Cornwall (NERC, 1991), and the highest tsunami arriving in Mount's Bay in the 1755 event was recorded at ca. 2.4 m (Davison, 1924), it is likely that any tsunami signatures from the 1755 event, other than sand layers preserved in back-barrier settings, would have been lost or "overprinted" due to subsequent intense storm activity. Dawson et al (2000) indicate that "there are no known reports of the progress of this tsunami NE along the English Channel" (p. 61), and DEFRA (2006) do not include the English Channel or North Sea in their models.…”
Section: Far-field Tsunamimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While it was considered in the past that this fault might be an active source of earthquakes (e.g. Davison 1924), since many epicentres are off the fault zone itself, it is more likely that the fault creates a zone of weakness of some width (Musson 2007).…”
Section: Recent Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%