2003
DOI: 10.1002/uog.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A histological and radiological investigation of the nasal bone in fetuses with Down syndrome

Abstract: Objectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
41
2
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
41
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings were reported in the FASTER study, where none of the trisomy 21 fetuses showed the absence of nasal bone; however, this study is criticized based on the nasal bone evaluation technique used [13] . The findings of our study are consistent with postmortem studies which reported that onefourth to one-third of trisomy 21 fetuses have 'absent nasal bones' [17,18] . The reliability of ultrasound assessment of nasal bone is questioned in some postmortem studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar findings were reported in the FASTER study, where none of the trisomy 21 fetuses showed the absence of nasal bone; however, this study is criticized based on the nasal bone evaluation technique used [13] . The findings of our study are consistent with postmortem studies which reported that onefourth to one-third of trisomy 21 fetuses have 'absent nasal bones' [17,18] . The reliability of ultrasound assessment of nasal bone is questioned in some postmortem studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The nasal bone was found to be absent in 33% (3/9) of fetuses with trisomy 21 in our study, which is lower than in the initial reports which usually reported around 70% [1,5,6,9,14,18,19] . However, this figure is consistent with recent publications reporting a lower prevalence in unselected populations [9,16] .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…14,15 Of the aneuploid fetuses who did have a detectable nasal bone, it was considerably shorter and less ossified when compared with euploid counterparts. 16 Cicero et al 17 reported that the absence of a nasal bone during the first trimester had a likelihood ratio of 27.8 (95% CI, 23.1-33.5) for the detection of trisomy 21. This finding was recently extended to the second trimester by both Bromley et al 8 and Odibo et al 10 The data from our study indicate that in a high-risk population, with a prevalence of 1.2% for Down syndrome, an absent nasal bone in the second trimester is associated with trisomy 21.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the high rate of attrition (i.e. spontaneous loss) of Down syndrome fetuses 3 in early pregnancy and the strong association of an absent nasal bone with Down syndrome 4,5 , it is expected that, apart from the ethnic variations, the prevalence of an absent nasal bone will be determined largely by the incidence…”
Section: Absent Nasal Bone: Applying the Right Terminology And Interpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One 4 compared the sonographic findings of the nasal bone in trisomy 21 fetuses with the pathomorphological studies, and in the vast majority of cases with the nasal bone being described at ultrasound as absent or hypoplastic (16/17), the presence of an ossification center was reported. The second paper 5 was a histological and radiological investigation of 33 trisomy 21 fetuses, showing the absence of the nasal bone in one third of the affected fetuses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%