2014
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-539239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A highly specific blood test for vCJD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Like our PMCA method, the MRC vCJD blood assay displayed an excellent analytical sensitivity and specificity. However about a third of the vCJD blood samples tested so far were score negative (6 out the 21 vCJD affected cases) [26], [55], [56]. The idea of a lower/absence of prionemia in certain vCJD cases is also indirectly supported by the observations recently reported by Mead et al This author reported that in a vCJD affected patient that was negative using the MRC vCJD blood detection assay, the lympho-reticular tissues displayed unusually low PrP Sc accumulation levels [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like our PMCA method, the MRC vCJD blood assay displayed an excellent analytical sensitivity and specificity. However about a third of the vCJD blood samples tested so far were score negative (6 out the 21 vCJD affected cases) [26], [55], [56]. The idea of a lower/absence of prionemia in certain vCJD cases is also indirectly supported by the observations recently reported by Mead et al This author reported that in a vCJD affected patient that was negative using the MRC vCJD blood detection assay, the lympho-reticular tissues displayed unusually low PrP Sc accumulation levels [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the occurrence of vCJD cases caused by administration of prion-infected human blood has highlighted the realistic opportunity for the development of a blood-based diagnostic test for this condition. Recent developments have shown promise with the detection of vCJD-positive blood samples from clinical vCJD cases by immuno-biochemical selection of disease-associated PrP, without the use of PK [42,43], and by detection of PK-resistant PrPSc following PMCA [44]. Since transmissibility is a defining hallmark of prion diseases, it will be important to develop a reasonably rapid and versatile confirmatory prion infectivity bioassay to supplement these biochemical-based prion diagnostic assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previously contested, these findings have been supported by a recent study demonstrating infectivity following intracranial injection of plasma from two sCJD patients into humanized transgenic mice and by the detection of infectivity in the bone marrow from sCJD patients . Attempts have been made to detect PrP TSE in soluble and cellular blood fractions from clinical sCJD patients by biochemical methods following amplification or concentration protocols, but these have yielded either unsuccessful or inconsistent results . This is notable, considering that one of these techniques, protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA), has reliably detected PrP TSE in blood from different experimental models of prion disease as well as vCJD patients .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,23 Attempts have been made to detect PrP TSE in soluble and cellular blood fractions from clinical sCJD patients by biochemical methods following amplification or concentration protocols, but these have yielded either unsuccessful 5 or inconsistent results. 24,25 This is notable, considering that one of these techniques, protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA), has reliably detected PrP TSE in blood from different experimental models of prion disease as well as vCJD patients. 24,[26][27][28] One plausible explanation for the inconsistent detection of PrP TSE in blood from sCJD patients by PMCA relies on differences in conformation of the various prion strains and their specific requirements for in vitro conversion, which may result in ineffective amplification of sCJD prions by this technique (Saá et al, unpublished observations).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%