The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing 2002
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2002.5744968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A highly scalable spherical microphone array based on an orthonormal decomposition of the soundfield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
153
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
153
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[6] presented a framework for performing decomposition using spherical convolution under the assumption of a continuous pressure-sensitive microphone array surface. In case of discrete microphones positioned on the sphere surface this assumption is invalid, and a quadrature formulae that preserves the orthonormality of spherical harmonics should be used as in [2]. Quadrature based on Fliege points [8] was presented and evaluated and two plane-wave decomposition algorithms were developed in [7], The current work analyzes the performance of those algorithms under realistic operating conditions -nite number of microphones, environmental noise, and aliasing effects -using both synthetic and experimental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] presented a framework for performing decomposition using spherical convolution under the assumption of a continuous pressure-sensitive microphone array surface. In case of discrete microphones positioned on the sphere surface this assumption is invalid, and a quadrature formulae that preserves the orthonormality of spherical harmonics should be used as in [2]. Quadrature based on Fliege points [8] was presented and evaluated and two plane-wave decomposition algorithms were developed in [7], The current work analyzes the performance of those algorithms under realistic operating conditions -nite number of microphones, environmental noise, and aliasing effects -using both synthetic and experimental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of an acoustically rigid spherical baffle for recording, where the microphone array is mounted, is particularly convenient because it adds stability during pseudo-inversion, as opposed to the so-called open microphone arrays that do not use a rigid baffle [78,79].…”
Section: Combination Matrices For Spherical Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capture of sound with uniform resolution along directions is possible by using a spherical array of microphones for recording [78,79] and a spherical array of sources for characterizing the HRTF dataset [27][28][29]. The use of an acoustically rigid spherical baffle for recording, where the microphone array is mounted, is particularly convenient because it adds stability during pseudo-inversion, as opposed to the so-called open microphone arrays that do not use a rigid baffle [78,79].…”
Section: Combination Matrices For Spherical Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper instead proposes the use of beamforming optimized considering a linear model of sound propagation and scattering. During the last decade, a number of works that use the sound scattering properties of rigid bodies for designing microphone arrays have appeared, such as those of Meyer and Elko [5] and Teutsch and Kellermann [6]. These works leverage the effective increase in the microphone array aperture size, resulting from the scattering of rigid spheres and cylinders, for improving the signal-to-noise (SNR) performance at low frequencies and increasing the aliasing frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%