1996
DOI: 10.1002/anie.199526711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Highly Reactive and Catalytically Active Model System for Intradiol‐Cleaving Catechol Dioxygenases: Structure and Reactivity of Iron(III) Catecholate Complexes of N,N′‐Dimethyl‐2,11‐diaza[3.3](2,6)pyridinophane

Abstract: COMMUNICATIONS[(I] Scveriil comp~)tind\ of thc type PhSeSiR, (R, = Me,, Et,. Me,Ph. Me,rBu. Ph,iBu) Mere Acreened for this purpose; however, compound 1 was hest suited fool the radicnl chain group transfer reaction because ofits stability to hydrolysis [J] 1351. _I. H. Byen. T G. Gleason, K S. Knight. J. Clirm. So<,. C/iriii. Cmiiiiuii. 19YI. 354 356. 1x1 T. H:iinnd,i. A Nishida. 0. Yonemitsu. J Ain. Cheni So< 1986. 108, 140-145: 1' . Hamada. .A Nishida. 0 Yonemitsu. ihid. 1980. /02. 3978-3Y80. [O] 1). Rc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
51
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of intradiol cleavage products for the catecholate adduct of the iron(II) complex is expected of the six‐coordinate geometry, which favours a substrate‐activation rather than dioxygen‐activation pathway as the latter requires a vacant coordination site on the catecholate adduct for oxygen coordination followed by activation. The observation of smaller amounts of extradiol products for this iron(II) complex may be explained by invoking the partial displacement of the phen ligand from the coordination sphere containing more Lewis basic ligand donors (ethanol), which facilitates dioxygen attack on iron(III) for extradiol cleavage to occur.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of intradiol cleavage products for the catecholate adduct of the iron(II) complex is expected of the six‐coordinate geometry, which favours a substrate‐activation rather than dioxygen‐activation pathway as the latter requires a vacant coordination site on the catecholate adduct for oxygen coordination followed by activation. The observation of smaller amounts of extradiol products for this iron(II) complex may be explained by invoking the partial displacement of the phen ligand from the coordination sphere containing more Lewis basic ligand donors (ethanol), which facilitates dioxygen attack on iron(III) for extradiol cleavage to occur.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one of the problems with many current iron-based catalysts is that the substrate must be used in excess, creating issues with process scale-up. In an effort to overcome this, Che and co-workers have reported the use of a variety of iron complexes, previously reported as models for catechol dioxygenase by Krüger and co-workers (73, 74), in conjunction with oxone (peroxymonosulphate) rather than hydrogen peroxide as the oxidant. These complexes were used to oxidize a variety of alkenes with good selectivity for the cis -diol and with excellent conversion on a significant scale (~10g) (Figure 15) (74).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[d] k obs =1 + log(Abs) vs time. [e] k O2 = k obs /[O 2 ], the solubility of O 2 in water, 1.38 × 10 −3 M; in acetonitrile, 8.1 × 10 −3 M and in dichloromethane, 5.8 ×10 −3 M at 25°C. [f] t 1/2 =0.693/ k obs .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%