2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04449-y
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A highly magnified star at redshift 6.2

Abstract: Galaxy clusters magnify background objects through strong gravitational lensing. Typical magnifications for lensed galaxies are factors of a few but can also be as high as tens or hundreds, stretching galaxies into giant arcs 1;2 . Individual stars can attain even higher magnifications given fortuitous alignment with the lensing cluster. Recently, several individual stars at redshift z ∼ 1 − 1.5 have been discovered, magnified by factors of thousands, temporarily boosted by microlensing 3;4;5;6 . Here we repor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
90
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
6
90
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although spectral measurements of Earendel are still not available, and photometric measurements are relatively poor, it is believed that Earendel is a star with very low metallicity and very luminous. Earlier estimates in Welch et al (2022) would put Earendel in pair with the most luminous stars known in our local volume (R < 40 Mpc). As in the case of Godzilla discussed above, no significant flux variations are appreciated during the two epochs (3 years apart) where Earendel was observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although spectral measurements of Earendel are still not available, and photometric measurements are relatively poor, it is believed that Earendel is a star with very low metallicity and very luminous. Earlier estimates in Welch et al (2022) would put Earendel in pair with the most luminous stars known in our local volume (R < 40 Mpc). As in the case of Godzilla discussed above, no significant flux variations are appreciated during the two epochs (3 years apart) where Earendel was observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This is consistent with the magnification of the star being in the range of several thousands. In this situation, as discussed in Diego et al (2022) and Welch et al (2022), there is an effect known as the "more-is-less" effect, where increassing the magnification results in more overlapping microcaustics in the source plane. Crossing one of these microcaustics results in a relatively small change in flux, since the flux linked to other microcaustics is still significant, and remain more or less constant during the microcaustic crossing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intervening mass along the lineof-sight of conventional observations acts to magnify the observed radiation, allowing the detection of background objects whose direct EM radiation would be otherwise too faint because of their distance. This enabled the detection of increasingly remote galaxy populations (Kneib et al 2004;Bouwens et al 2014) and even individual stars at high redshifts (Kelly et al 2018;Welch et al 2022). Similarly, gravitational lensing can play a key role to investigate distant populations of GW sources, reaching beyond the limited sensitivity of current detectors, in particular in the low mass regime of binary neutron stars ★ mbianconi@star.sr.bham.ac.uk (Smith et al 2022, and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this state of affairs still holds broadly, inroads are being made. Observers have detected a star at redshift 6 (Welch et al 2022), galaxies as early as redshift 11 (Oesch et al 2016), a long gamma ray burst (GRB) at redshift 8 (Tanvir et al 2009), and quasars at redshifts 6 and 7 (Mortlock et al 2011;Wu et al 2015;Bañados et al 2018;Matsuoka et al 2019;Wang et al 2021). These high redshift observations have greatly increased our knowledge of the early universe, but they also raise questions-most notably, where did the high redshift quasars and their supermassive black hole (SMBH) engines come from?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%