2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11028.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A highly abnormal massive star mass function in the Orion Nebula cluster and the dynamical decay of trapezium systems

Abstract: The Orion Nebula cluster (ONC) appears to be unusual on two grounds: the observed constellation of the OB stars of the entire ONC and its Trapezium at its centre implies a time-scale problem given the age of the Trapezium, and an initial mass function (IMF) problem for the whole OB star population in the ONC. Given the estimated crossing time of the Trapezium, it ought to have totally dynamically decayed by now. Furthermore, by combining the lower limit of the ONC mass with a standard IMF it emerges that the O… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
126
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(75 reference statements)
4
126
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To conclude, we note that searches for bow shocks with the next generation of space infrared telescopes along with future high-precision proper motion measurements for massive field stars with the space astrometry mission Gaia will allow us to solve the problem of whether the massive stars form solely in the clustered mode and subsequently leave their parent clusters because of the gravitational interaction with other massive stars (Poveda et al 1967;Leonard & Duncan 1990; see also Kroupa 1998;Pflamm-Altenburg & Kroupa 2006;Gvaramadze et al 2009b;Gvaramadze & Gualandris 2010), or whether they can also form in situ (in the field and/or in low-mass clusters; e.g. Oey et al 2004;Parker & Goodwin 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To conclude, we note that searches for bow shocks with the next generation of space infrared telescopes along with future high-precision proper motion measurements for massive field stars with the space astrometry mission Gaia will allow us to solve the problem of whether the massive stars form solely in the clustered mode and subsequently leave their parent clusters because of the gravitational interaction with other massive stars (Poveda et al 1967;Leonard & Duncan 1990; see also Kroupa 1998;Pflamm-Altenburg & Kroupa 2006;Gvaramadze et al 2009b;Gvaramadze & Gualandris 2010), or whether they can also form in situ (in the field and/or in low-mass clusters; e.g. Oey et al 2004;Parker & Goodwin 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pflamm-Altenburg & Kroupa 2006;Moeckel & Bate 2010). The ejected (runaway) stars form the population of field OB stars that end their lives in supernova explosions hundreds of parsecs from their birthplaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gvaramadze 2009). The only viable alternative is that the massive stars were ejected in the field via dynamical three-or four-body encounters (Poveda et al 1967;Leonard & Duncan 1990;Kroupa 1998;Pflamm-Altenburg & Kroupa 2006;Gvaramadze, Gualandris & Portegues Zwart 2008, 2009). Naturally, less massive (late B-type) stars are also ejected from their birth clusters by dynamical interactions (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An obvious alternative to this interpretation is that the massive field stars were actually formed in a clustered environment and subsequently ejected from their birth sites via dynamical processes (e.g. Clarke & Pringle 1992;Pflamm-Altenburg & Kroupa 2006); i.e., the field massive stars are runaway stars (Walborn et al 2002;Brandl et al 2007). The large separations from the possible parent clusters and the young (∼2 Myr) ages of the very massive field stars imply that their (transverse) velocities should be as high as ∼50−100 km s −1 (Walborn et al 2002).…”
Section: Very Massive Field Stars As Runawaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the initial density may have been one to two orders of magnitude higher than that today. Pflamm-Altenburg & Kroupa (2006) investigate the decay of the ONC core. Models with initially 40 massive stars (>600 M ), which is the expected number if stars in the ONC, were selected from the canonical IMF at birth, in a region of 0.025 pc end up with about the observed number of massive objects (10 stars above 5 M ) and display a Trapezium structure.…”
Section: Orion Nebula Clustermentioning
confidence: 99%